THIS NATION
AND SOCIALISM
ARE ONE
__TITLE__
THIS NATION
Selected Writings of Le Duan
First Secretary, Central Committee
Vietnam Workers Party
Edited with an Introduction by Iran Van Dink
Le Duan
Vanguard Books Chicago, 1976
On August 7, 1964, the day President Johnson ordered the bombing of North Vietnam, I was speaking at a college in California on "The Essence and the Meaning of the Vietnamese Revolution. "At the end of my address, a student came to me, shook my hand and said: "Please tell the North Vietnamese not to give up." Before I could ask for her name and thank her, she ran away.
To her and to millions of unknown Americans, workers, intellectuals, students, businessmen who have supported the Vietnamese "Just Cause", this book is dedicated.
Copyright ©1976 by Iran Van Dinh
Printed in the United States of America
All Rights Reserved
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
Le Duan. Edited by Tran Van Dinh
This nation and socialism are one
Bibliography: p. 259-61
Summary: A collection of essays by the First Secretary of the
Vietnam Workers Party on building socialism in Vietnam.
1 Socialism---Vietnam 2 Vietnam---History
I Tran Van Dinh II Title
959.7
76-52513
ISBN 0-917702-01-8
VANGUARD BOOKS P.O. Box 3556 Chicago, Illinois 60654
Acknowledgements and Permissions
``Revolution is the Work of the Masses" first appeared in On the Socialist Revolution in Vietnam, Vol. I; Foreign Languages Publishing House, Hanoi, 1965.
``Principles and Methods of Revolutionary Action" is reprinted from The Vietnamese Revolution, (1971) with permission from International Publishers.
``The Working Class and Socialist Industrialization" first appeared in On the Socialist Revolution in Vietnam, Vol. II; Foreign Languages Publishing House, Hanoi, 1974.
``The New Stage of Our Revolution and the Tasks of the Trade Unions" first appeared in Some Present Tasks; Foreign Languages Publishing House, Hanoi, 1974.
``Some Problems of Cadres and Organization in the Socialist Revolution" first appeared in Some Present Tasks, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Hanoi, 1974.
``Role and Tasks of the Vietnamese Woman in the New Revolutionary Stage" first appeared in Some Present Tasks; Foreign Languages Publishing House, Hanoi, 1974.
``Problems of Revolutionary Strategy" is reprinted from The Vietnamese Revolution (1971) with permission from International Publishers.
vn
``Let Our Entire People Unite to Build Our Reunified and Socialist Fatherland" first appeared in the "Daily Report Annex" of the Foreign Broadcast Information Service, Vol. IV. No. 126, Annex No. 105, June, 1976.
``Platform of the Viet-Nam Lao Dong (Workers Party)" is reprinted from Conflict in Indochina and International Repercussions: A Documentary History: 1945-1955, by Allan B. Cole et. al., Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1955.
``Political Theses of the Indochinese Communist Party" is reprinted from The Long Resistance [1858-1975], by Nguyen Khac Vien, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Hanoi, 1975.
``A Circular Letter Sent Out by Nghe Tinh Patriots" is reprinted from The Long Resistance [1858-1975], by Nguyen Khac Vien, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Hanoi, 1975.
The essays in this book are reprinted as they originally appeared in the above publications.
The photograph on the front cover shows the liberation of Da Nang, a former U.S. military base and a city in central Vietnam.
Contents
Preface
Introduction
On the Use of Vietnamese Names
Le Duan On Revolution
Revolution is the Work of the Masses
Principles and Methods of Revolutionary Action
The Working Class and Socialist Industrialization
Some Problems of Cadres and Organization in Socialist Revolution
Le Duan on the Vietnamese Revolution
The New Stage of our Revolution and the Tasks of the Trade Unions
Role and Tasks of the Vietnamese Woman in the New Revolutionary Stage
Problems of Revolutionary Strategy On the Vietnam People's Army
XI
xni
xxi
17 31 49
99127 153 167
vm
Le Duan on the Socialist Reconstruction of Vietnam
Let Our Entire People Unite to Build Our Reunified and Socialist Fatherland
175215 221 225 237
243 249 255 259
Preface
Appendices
Funeral Oration
Last Will and Testament of President Ho Chi Minh
Platform of Viet Nam Lao Dong (Workers Party)
Political Theses of the Indochinese Communist Party
A Circular Letter Sent Out by Nghe Tinh Patriots
Notes
Chronology of Events
Bibliography
On May 1st, 1975 with the Vietnamese liberation of Saigon, a new era in world politics had begun. Uncle Ho had always reminded his people that the Vietnamese Revolution was being undertaken not only as a national revolution, but as part of a major international revolution that had begun in 1917. The Vietnamese people, while proud of their national accomplishments, have always insisted that they are firm advocates of proletarian internationalism. However, while the war had ended in Vietnam, the revolution had just begun. The task of building socialism became the responsibility of the victorious party and Le Duan has proved to be one of its most accomplished spokesmen. This, then, is the voice of a revolutionary whose right to speak comes as a result of scientific investigation and revolutionary practice.
The task of compiling and editing this study from Vietnamese was undertaken by Professor Tran Van Dinh. It was during those tumultuous days of the late 60's and early 70's when the American people were speaking out against the policies adopted by their government towards the Vietnamese and Afro-American peoples, that I mentioned to my friend Tran Van Dinh that there was a remarkable dearth of literature in the English language about the Vietnamese Revolution written by the Vietnamese. The Vietnamese people had contributed so much to liberation movements, it was imperative that the writings of the Vietnamese be made available to a broader audience. We are indeed grateful to Professor Tran Van Dinh for making this study available for the English-speaking community. This volume will be a welcome addition to the literature of modern revolutions.
A. W. Singham Washington D.C. 1976
XI
Introduction
". . . The Confucian scholar on the execution block repeated: 7 die, but I have fulfilled my duty.' The militant communist, facing a firing squad, said: 'I die but you will be defeated', and thought: 'When the contradictions come to a head, we will be there and we will win. . ."
Nguyen Khac Vien (1)
Vietnam is not a gift of nature. It is the work of Vietnamese women and men who, during the last four thousand years, have been engaged in the continuing efforts of DUNG NUOC (To Build a Nation) and of GIU NUOC (To Defend the Nation). A dialectical relationship exists between these two tasks: to build a nation is to defend it, to defend it is to build it. The history of Vietnam has proved that although the Vietnamese at all times have resisted foreign aggression, their national resistance was successful only if they combined the task of DUNG NUOC with that of GIU NUOC, that is to closely relate production to defense. (2) In other words, a social revolution, that is a class struggle which alters the mode of production, is an indispensable and an integral part of a victorious military resistance. One of the early examples was the victory of the Vietnamese over the Mongols, who in the thirteenth century three times invaded Vietnam. The most recent is the Vietnamese wars of resistance against the French (1946-1954) and the Americans (1956-1975).
In 1858, when the Vietnamese monarchy was decadent and Vietnamese feudal society torn by increasing contradictions
Xlll
between greedy landlords and impoverished peasants, the French colonialists attacked Vietnam. The Court at Hue put up a token resistance but quickly surrendered. The masses under the leadership of patriotic Confucian scholars continued a difficult, protracted struggle which ended in failure despite heroic individual acts and enormous sacrifices. At the end of the nineteenth century the French completely occupied Vietnam. (3) The French colonization and exploitation created new contradictions and sharpened old ones. By the early twentieth century Vietnamese society "had two basic contradictions: the contradiction between the Vietnamese nation and oppressive imperialism, and that between the broad masses and the feudal landlord classes". (4) New anti-French rebellions erupted, but again all collapsed under the bloody repression of the French police and army. The main reason for these failures was the inability of anti-French, nationalist parties to "put forth a correct political programme aimed at solving the above mentioned contradictions." (5)
Humiliated and angered by these defeats, a number of Vietnamese patriots left the country "in search for a path of national liberation, the right path for the revolution in Vietnam". (6) One of these patriots was Nguyen Ai Quoc (Nguyen the Patriot) who was to become in 1945 President Ho Chi Minh of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam. (7) Born in 1890, Ho Chi Minh studied at Quoc Hoc (National Studies) College in Hue. After a short career as a teacher, he went to France, working as a cook on a French merchant ship, in 1911. He travelled throughout the world, visiting Africa and the American east coast. From his observations of America and the conditions of the Blacks, he wrote: ``Lynching'' and 'The Ku Klux Klan". (8)
Ho Chi Minh returned to France at the end of World War I to present the demands for Vietnam's independence at the Versailles Peace conference, but he was not heard. Continuing the search for a solution to the sufferings of his people, he followed the development of the Soviet Revolution. He was convinced that Lenin's theses on the national and colonial question was the ideological path for national liberation. (9) In December 1920, he participated in the Congress of the French Socialist Party which split into two:
the majority formed the French Communist Party (FCP) and joined the Third International, the minority kept the name Socialist Party and joined the Second International. A founding member of the FCP, Ho Chi Minh was the first Vietnamese communist.
In 1921, with the help of the FCP, he founded the League of Colonial Countries. The League published a weekly, "Le Farias", which attacked French colonial policy in Vietnam and Africa. He wrote a book: Proces de la Colonisation Francaise (French Colonialism on Trial) and mobilized the oppressed colonial masses to fight and to follow Marxism-Leninism. ". . . In their life of sufferings and inequality" Ho Chi Minh affirmed, "the colonial peoples find in Lenin the creator of a new life, a lighthouse showing to the whole oppressed mankind the way to liberation." (10) He constantly urged that the colonial peoples must be united with the metropolitan proletariat in joint action against the common enemy, that is, imperialism. In June 1923, he attended in Moscow the International Peasants Conference and was elected to its Executive Committee. After Lenin's death, the Communist International held its Fifth Congress in Moscow from June 17th to July 8th, 1924. Ho Chi Minh participated in its deliberations as a representative of the FCP and the colonial countries. During his stay in the USSR, he contributed articles to newspapers and magazines and wrote two books: China and the Chinese Youth and The Black Race. (11)
In December 1924 he arrived in Canton, South China to be near home and to build the revolutionary movement in Indochina. He founded the League of the Oppressed Peoples in Asia. In 1925 he organized the Vietnam Young Revolutionary Comrades Association (VNYRCA). With a communist group at the core, the purpose of the VNYRCA was to educate Vietnamese youth, preparing the grounds for the founding of a communist party in Indochina. The VNYRCA cadres, trained by Ho Chi Minh in China, returned secretly to Vietnam to agitate. In 1927 Chiang Kai-Shek staged a counter-revolution in Canton. As a result the Vietnamese were persecuted and the VNYRCA headquarters had to move to Hong Kong.
Ho Chi Minh went to Shanghai, and then to the USSR and Belgium where he attended the Anti-Imperialist War Conference.
xv
xiv
After visiting France, Germany, Switzerland, and Italy, he left Europe for Thailand where he organized the Vietnamese community in that country. During his absence, the VNYRCA spread its activities in factories, and in May 1929 held its Congress in Macao. The Congress was attended by active communist members coming from different parts of Vietnam. In late 1929, Ho Chi Minh arrived in Hong Kong to convene the Unified Conference which merged the three communist organizations into one party. On February 3, 1930 the Vietnamese Communist Party was officially formed. In October 1930 the Party's Central Committee held its first session in Hong Kong, discussed and passed the Political Programme, and decided to change the Party's name to the Indochinese Communist Party (ICP). Young Vietnamese progressive patriots now had a Marxist-Leninist party to look to in their struggle. Many joined it, among them Le Duan (pronounced: Lee Zuan).
Le Duan was born in Quang Tri (the central part of Vietnam) in 1908. After finishing his high school education and joining the ICP, he worked in the railroad service. In 1931, he was arrested for his political activities and sentenced to twenty years hard labor. (12) In prison he continued his activism among the other inmates, among them Nguyen Luong Bang, now Vice President of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. On May 3, 1936 the French Popular Front won a clear-cut victory in the general elections resulting in the coming to power of a Popular Front government in Paris. The new French government declared a general amnesty to political prisoners in Indochina. Freed, Le Duan devoted himself to party work which was both legal and illegal. As a cover, he opened a bookstore in Hue, the imperial city. The ICP's policy during that period (1936-1939) was on the one side to openly struggle for democratic rights, and on the other side secretly consolidate the party and mass organizations, combining legal, semi-legal, and illegal activities to fulfill their revolutionary task.
In September 1939 World War II broke out in Europe. The French colonial administration in Indochina ordered general mobilization. The elementary democratic rights gained by the workers and peasants during the Popular Front period were wiped out, and the ICP was outlawed. In November 1939 as a member of
the ICP's Central Committee, Le Duan participated in a secret meeting which founded the Indochinese Anti-Imperialist National United Front, an organization aimed at unifying all peoples, all classes, against fascism and imperialism. In September 1940 Indochina was invaded by the Japanese Imperial Army. Offering no resistance, the French colonial authorities cooperated with the Japanese fascists. They arrested most of the ICP's Central Committee members. Le Duan was given a ten-year sentence and sent to the infamous Poulo Condor island penitentiary, off the coast of southern Vietnam. (13) He stayed there until August 1945 when the victory of the Revolution freed him and his comrades.
During the First Indochina War of Resistance against the French (1946-1954) Le Duan represented the ICP (which changed its name in 1951 to the Dang Lao Dong Vietnam or Vietnam Workers Party [VWP]) on the southern front as a political commissar of the people's army. At the end of the war and the signing of the 1954 Geneva Agreements temporarily dividing Vietnam into two zones pending elections for reunification to take place in 1956, Le Duan stayed on in the south for party work while most of the VWP's leading cadres were repatriated to the north. (14) In late 1956, due to errors committed in the implementation of the Land Reform, errors which both the Party and the government publicly admitted, President Ho Chi Minh took over the secretary generalship of the VWP, replacing Truong Chinh, now chairman of the National Assembly., Le Duan was recalled to the north to carry out the day to day assignments in the Party's Central Committee. In 1959 he was named Secretary General of the Central Committee of the Party and in September 1960, when the title of Secretary General was changed to First Secretary, became First Secretary of the Central Committee, Vietnam Workers Party. In that capacity he has visited other socialist countries, alone or with President Ho Chi Minh, to represent the VWP.
After the liberation of "South Vietnam" and Saigon he paid a quick visit to the south in May 1975. In the elections for a unified Vietnam National Assembly in April 1976, he was re-elected in District 2 (Hanoi) with 99.76 per cent of the vote, the highest. On
xvn
xvi
June 25, 1976 he delivered the Political Report to the National Assembly, thus officially opening the stage of Socialist Reconstruction for the whole of Vietnam.
The U.S. State Department's biographical data on Mr. Le Duan (15) calls him "a master mind behind the scenes", and a `` hardliner''. These descriptions, as we can see through his own writings, are not true, and are simply the manifestations of unscientific and conspiratorial habits on the part of U.S. government officials. Like his colleagues in the Party, he abides by collective decisions, after discussions and deliberations of the Central Committee. As a Marxist-Leninist who believes that Marxism-Leninism is not a dead science, but a creative philosophical and political force, he is not dogmatic. The experiences of the Vietnamese struggle since 1930 have led him to conclude that "revolution is not only a science, but also an art". It is "creation and it cannot succeed without imagination and ingenuity". He argued that "there has never been nor will there be a unique formula for making a revolution that is suited to all situations". (16)
As an individual he can be described as a "Vietnamese who is moral, loyal, patient, strong, indomitable but filled with compassion", not a superman "endowed with steel skin and copper bones" to paraphrase what he said in an address to the soldiers and people of Quang Binh province during the TET (New Year) of 1973. (17) The aim of this work is not to praise Mr. Le Duan. Nor is it to glorify the Vietnamese Revolution which can stand by itself as one of the most important contributions to human liberation in the twentieth century in both theory and practice. It is simply to familiarize the non-Vietnamese readers with the thoughts of a man who is assuming a great responsibility together with his comrades and his party, of leading the Vietnamese revolution in its most difficult stage: the socialist reconstruction of a country devastated by thirty years of war. (18)
At the date of the publication of this book Mr. Le Duan is convening, from December 11 to December 20, 1976 in Hanoi, the capital of the reunified Vietnam, the Fourth Congress of the VWP. (19) Forty-six years have passed since the foundation by Ho Chi Minh of the Indochinese Communist Party, the predecessor of the
VWP. During that relatively short period of time the Party, with the backing of the masses, the assistance of fraternal socialist countries and the support of progressive peoples all over the world including the Americans, has led the Vietnamese to the victory over the French colonial army at Dien Bien Phu in 1954 and to the defeat in 1975 of the U.S. ``special'' and ``limited'' wars and the Kissinger B-52 diplomacy. Within a Vietnam, now independent, free and unified, the task of the VWP, under the experienced guidance of Mr. Le Duan, is to educate and mobilize fifty million Vietnamese to build the first socialist state in Southeast Asia. With reinforced national unity and continuing international solidarity, this difficult task will be equally successful.
Tran Van Dinh October, 1976
xvni
xix
On the Use of Vietnamese Names
In the Vietnamese usage, similar to the Chinese, a person's family name comes first, followed by her or his middle name (optional) then given names. Since there are not many family names in Vietnam, the most common being: Le, Nguyen, Tran, Phan, Ngo, Vo, Pham, Ly, Hoang, ... a reference to family names alone would create confusion. Therefore, Vietnamese are generally known by their given names. Example: General Vo Nguyen Giap. Since Vo is his family name and Giap his given name, he is known as General Giap or, more formally, General Vo Nguyen Giap. This is the form I prefer and it will be used in this book. There is an exception however. To convey the sense of respect and admiration to a leader, people would address her or him by her or his family name only. For Example: Hai Ba Trung (the two ladies Trung referring to two sisters Trung Trac and Trung Nhi who revolted against the Chinese feudal domination of Vietnam in the first century) or President Ho or Uncle Ho for President Ho Chi Minh. He has been and is known as President Ho, not President Minh.
I
xxi
Le Duan on Revolution
Revolution is the Work of the Masses
Since human society exists its history is made and constantly pushed forward by the masses. No great event nor revolutionary change in society is possible without the active participation and support of the masses.
But the decisive role of the masses was not realized from the outset. Out of their own interests the exploiting classes blurred the historical role of the masses whom they looked upon as dunces. Formerly due to their own class viewpoint and historical conditions, philosophers could not correctly realize the role of the masses whom they regarded just as negative or passive elements at the talented men's beck and call. This wrong viewpoint led former historians to record only the feats of individuals, heroes, kings and mandarins, or well-known generals, overlooking the role of the masses.
It was not until the birth of Marxism thousands of years after that the masses were recognized as makers of history. This discovery, Marx's important contribution, was made possible by the whole process of objective historical development during which the role of the masses became more and more conspicuous. When making the anti-feudal revolution the bourgeoisie had to seek the participation of the masses, who then began to be conscious of their
Written on the occasion of the 13th anniversary of the founding of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (1958).
own force and of the political struggle; after this revolution, they also won some democratic rights in many forms, thus drawing every one's attention to their role.
Simultaneously with the emergence and development of the great capitalist industrial production, the proletariat also came into being and grew ever stronger. The centralized labour and the struggle for daily interests, the organizational spirit, discipline and solidarity in fighting tempered in factories have gradually made the proletariat realize their huge strength and also the role of the masses. On the other hand, the more developed the capitalist society, the more acute the contradiction: the annihilation of capitalism and the certain victory of socialism are unavoidable, thus making the proletariat ever conscious of their own role and historical mission, and act more actively to impel the natural evolution of history.
The proletariat is the first class in the history of mankind to have correctly realized the huge force of the masses, and it is Marxism only, the theory of the proletariat, which can scientifically express the historical creative role of the masses.
Since there was a correct notion on the role of the masses and after it gripped hundreds of millions of people, history has changed with an unimaginable rapidity, the positive spirit and the revolutionary creativeness of the masses have shown themselves most powerful, the period of historical development has been shortened, especially in the revolutionary periods when one day is worth twenty former years. The Russian October Socialist Revolution first brought the masses to the position of masters of their own fate. And only forty years after this revolution, socialism has become a world system with over one-third of the population and over onefifth of the territory of the globe. This is an unimaginable rapid leap in history, compared with the 150 years or 200 years capitalism had to take before it became a world system. And if we take into account that the appearance of capitalism only aims at replacing an exploiting class by another, while the regime of exploitation of man by man itself relying upon private ownership of means of production remains unchanged, whereas socialism must wipe out the exploiting regime and that of private ownership of means of production established since thousands of years, and set up the
regime of social ownership of means of production in so short a period, we see more clearly the strength and extraordinary creativeness of the masses once they realize that they must rise up to make their own history. Lenin said that revolution is a great festival of the oppressed and exploited people. Never are the people so active in creating the new social system as in the revolutionary period. In such a period, people can do wonders.
Our millenary history has also proved the decisive role of the masses. For more than one thousand years our country was invaded and ruled by foreign feudalists and our people had struggled heroically against the aggressors. The glorious deeds of two Trung Sisters,(l) Heroin Trieu,(2) Ly Thuong Kiet,(3) Tran Hung Dao,(4) Le Loi,(5) Quang Trung,(6) etc. were also those of our people, but in our history the role of the masses was also overshadowed, and the masses themselves were not fully aware of their own strength. The dynasties which succeeded one another were precisely decided by the masses, but on the upshot it was the latter which were oppressed, despised, and considered as dunces.
In the period when our country was invaded by the French imperialists, many Vietnamese patriots called upon the masses to rise up and fight for independence, but they regarded them just as passive people and could not realize that the success of the national liberation was the fruit of their work. An important factor of the failure of various patriotic campaigns was that these patriots did not correctly see the decisive role and impact of the masses in the imperialist era.
Only with the founding of the Indo-Chinese Communist Party, based on Marxism-Leninism and the practical study of the Vietnamese history, could the Vietnamese communists correctly assess the role of the masses. For the first time in our history our Party has pointed out: 'The revolution is the work of the masses to liberate themselves, no hero can save them; only by raising their consciousness, organizing and uniting themselves under the leadership of the vanguard unit of the working class---the Indo-Chinese Communist Party---can they liberate themselves." The Party's revolutionary programme which was set forth in 1930 to overthrow the imperialists and feudalists, establish the worker-peasant-soldier
Soviet power, and distribute land to the peasants, voiced confidence in and determination to rely upon the masses.
Facts have proved that though our economic development lagged behind imperialist France for hundreds of years, we succeeded in relying upon the immense and inexhaustible force of the masses, awaking their revolutionary positiveness, to speed up our advance by leaps and bounds. In a relatively short period we overthrew imperialism and the feudal power, liberated half the .country and are taking it gradually to socialism, a higher stage of development, much more equitable, rational and beautiful social system then capitalism. Had it not been for the correct mass viewpoint, and the leadership according to the Party's mass line we could not win such great and rapid a victory.
Vietnam Armed Propaganda Unit for National Liberation relied on the peasantry and the countryside; the August 1945 general insurrection to seize power was an uprising of the entire people,-but the main force was the labouring people, and the great majority of them were peasants. Our protracted Resistance War which lasted nearly nine years was basically a guerilla warfare waged by the peasants, with the countryside as the mainstay and base from which to encircle the towns, and the peasants contributing the greatest part of manpower and wealth to the Resistance War.
Realizing this great force our Party has assessed that the peasants were the main force of our national democratic revolution which was essentially a revolution of the peasants, under the leadership of the proletariat and its party.
As our Party stood firmly on the proletariat's mass standpoint it could clearly realize the broad mass character of our national democratic revolution. Our country was dominated and lost its independence, therefore every patriotic Vietnamese who approved of national independence could join the anti-imperialist force. On this national basis, we succeeded in establishing a broad unified national front including all classes, strata and patriots. The front was founded in the interest of the revolution, of the nation and also of the grassroot toiling masses. For the success of the revolution the grassroot masses could not be let alone but must have as many allies as possible, and even temporary and wavering ones must be won over. Experience has shown that only when the workerpeasant force is strengthened could we set up a firm unified national front. Inversely, if it was not strong the other strata of the people did not follow it, or wavered.
But the content of our revolution is not only national but also democratic. The aspiration of the masses, first of all the grassroot ones, was to be liberated from the imperialist and feudal yoke in order to improve their livelihood. To them patriotism means the safeguard of the existence of the nation and also of their own existence and welfare. Regarding the overwhelming majority of our people---the peasants---their dearest aspiration was to have land, and to be freed from slavery, humiliation and misery. The peasants enthusiastically took part in the revolution as they were conscious
Marxism-Leninism assesses that the history of mankind is that of a succession of methods of production, and of the producers and labouring people. To say that the masses create history is fundamentally to speak of the toiling masses.
In each historical stage the toiling masses differ from one another, therefore the contents of the conception of the masses also changes accordingly.
Under the millenary feudal regime the toiling masses were mainly peasants, the basic productive force of the society at that time.
Since the invasion of our country by the imperialists, in Vietnam, a colonial and semi-feudal country, the toiling masses consisted essentially of workers and peasants, with the latter accounting for the overwhelming majority. Therefore in the national-democratic revolutionary stage led by the Party the most fundamental prop for the struggle against French imperialists and reactionary feudalists was the peasants, a force which makes up 90 per cent of the population of our country.
The 1930 uprising to set up a soviet power in Nghe An was essentially an insurrection of peasants; the biggest force participating in the 1936-1939 democratic movement was also the peasants; the Nam Ky, Bac Son, etc. uprisings were fundamentally waged by the peasants; the founding of the Viet Bac free zone and the
of having land once the country had been independent. It is to satisfy this requirement that they have followed the proletariat and firmly built the worker-peasant alliance under the leadership of the working class, through its Party---the Indo-Chinese Communist Party.
Without democratic rights the force of the masses could not be fostered, first of all the grassroot ones and the unified national front could not be consolidated. It is precisely to foster the most basic force of the revolution and the resistance---the peasantry---that we carried out land reform during the Resistance War to satisfy the peasants' requirements and bring the Resistance War to victory.
In short, only by standing on the class standpoint and mass viewpoint of the proletariat can we see clearly the strength of the masses, realize that the peasantry is the main force in the national democratic revolution, and grasp the class content in this revolution.
Such a revolution cannot succeed if it is not made by the conscious masses with a bold revolutionary spirit.
Therefore, first of all the toiling masses must seize power and use it as the main tool to transform the old economy and production and build new ones. We must grasp the class viewpoint in the setting up of power, see to it that power really belongs to the toiling masses, who will directly manage the state machinery and the economic and cultural structures of society and turn these organizations into revolutionary organizations of the toiling masses and into means to serve the productive labour of the masses and their interests. It is wrong to think that the organizations of the state machinery can replace the masses who have to act on orders from upper levels only. Every line, guiding principle, policy, as well as the working method of the state organs which do not accord with the toiling masses' interests, will create difficulties to the socialist revolution in the North, and can harm the common revolutionary work throughout the country. Therefore, the leading cadres of our Party and state organs must realize the interests of the toiling masses, form as solid bloc with them, and proceed from their interests and common work to set forth the lines and policies and solve the inner contradictions likely to arise between the state interests and those of the masses. Only by so doing can we mobilize the revolutionary enthusiasm of the masses and push forward socialist revolution.
At present North Vietnam is gradually advancing to socialism. The revolution now underway is the most profound and greatest revolution in history. We must abolish the economy based on the exploitation of man by man, turn the scattered individual economy into a socialist collective one; build and develop the socialist economy unceasingly to improve the labouring people's living conditions and make our people advance to a happier life.
The socialist revolution requires the development of the positiveness and the extraordinary creativeness of the toiling masses which are the most basic productive force of society. To this end, we must free the mind of millions of people formerly tied up within the narrow framework of small production and private economy, and transform the individualist and selfish ideology of the strata of people who lived on exploitation. We must build a new ideology, the socialist ideology, making it gain supremacy in society and become a strong mover to impel the toiling people to transform society, nature and themselves.
The toiling masses in socialist revolution are first of all the working class.
The socialist revolution in Vietnam as well as in all the countries throughout the world, must first and foremost rely upon the force of the working class, the most progressive and revolutionary class within the masses, the class the most representative of socialism, leading the socialist revolution and construction. Without the working class standpoint and ideology we cannot understand socialism. At present, human society has only two paths: capitalism and socialism respectively represented by the bourgeoisie, and the working class.
The position of the working class is established not only in the
political and ideological fields, but mainly in the economic field; the working class is the master of enterprises, mines, industrial branches, communications and transport. Without relying upon it there can be no great industry with high technique as a material and technical basis of socialism, nor satisfactory management of industry, etc. Though our socialist industry is still weak, it is developing day by day, and must become a force leading the whole economy. Only in such a way can the tempo of economy in general develop rapidly.
To us, agriculture is playing a role of utmost importance, and is the basis to push forward all national productive branches. At present our industry cannot develop smoothly without a prosperous agriculture because the consumption market of our manufacture is essentially the home market, first of all the countryside; moreover most of the raw materials and food supplied to industry come from agriculture.
Therefore the peasant question is still a question of particular importance in the period of socialist revolution and construction in our country. Of more than 13 million people in North Vietnam(7) the peasants account for 12 million, and are the largest force. If we do not rely on them to build socialism, socialist construction is then the work of a few only and not of the broad masses, and therefore cannot succeed. About the Chinese peasantry Mao Tse-tung has said: "Our country has over 500 million peasants, how their situation is is very important in relation to the economic development and the strengthening of power in our country(S)". This applies to our country: in the socialist revolution in North Vietnam every work must proceed from the interests of over 13 million people, including 12 million peasants.
The extremely rich experience of China in socialist construction has given us a very new conception about the path to build socialism in the countryside. Without machines the Chinese peasants could proceed to socialism through co-operativization. Recently after a political remoulding drive, their mind being set free, they have progressed by leaps and bounds. Land productivity has shown an increase unknown in the history of the country. The Chinese peasants have voluntarily pooled money, strength and raw
materials for the construction of workshops, which have mushroomed in the countryside. In the leap-and-bound upsurge they have impelled culture rapidly to develop; they have not only wiped out illiteracy, popularized elementary education, but they have also opened high-education schools and vocational schools. In the Chinese countryside at present there is an intense movement to set up people's communes.
This experience has shown that once the broad peasant masses have been re-organized and roused, and their thinking liberated, their active militancy and creativeness in socialist construction are momentous.
The Vietnamese peasants, first of all the toiling peasants, possess revolutionary traditions. Since long they have followed our Party, and are united closely with the workers within the worker-peasant alliance to make revolution. Throughout the Resistance War and land reform their political and class consciousness have been raised markedly.
Though the poor toiling peasants have seen their living conditions much more improved after land reform, in general they are still in difficulty, the per capita land holding being three sao(9) for a poor peasant, and four sao for a middle peasant, that is why they also want to advance to socialism to secure a better life. As the peasant economy is a small-production economy still relying upon the private ownership system, they still are inclined to have private property, a number of well-off peasants want to grow rich in the capitalist way, therefore we must pay attention to their education and prevent their spontaneous tendency to capitalism. But the peasants' revolutionary positiveness is the main aspect. As the Party bases in the countryside have ever been strengthened, power and the peasant mass organization become strong with every passing day and really belong to the toiling peasants, we have all the positive factors to make the peasants join the movement for mutual exchange and co-operativization, and on this basis we rationally organize the labour force, improve technique, and impel the emulation movement for agricultural production to raise the peasants' living conditions and at the same time to push forward socialist revolution.
11 10The Party's and Government's policies to speed up production, such as the policies on trade, finance, banking, etc., must suitably serve the movement for agricultural production and co-- operativization. Our industry must also serve agriculture, supplying farm implements and fertilizers to it and solving the hydraulic problem for the peasants. On the basis of increased production and improved living conditions, the socialist consciousness will more deeply permeate the toiling peasants, curb their individualism and tendency to private ownership, and the socialist revolutionary wave in the the countryside will at an appointed time, advance by leaps and bounds. If the Party's and Government's policies, and the means used by the economic and financial organs to carry them out do not meet the toiling peasants' interests, or they arouse their suspicion and disagreement, worse still, their opposition, it means we have not yet grasped the mass viewpoint in socialist revolution. Beside the peasants' small production gradually advancing to cooperativization, handicraftsmen are also a fairly important productive force in the economy of our country. They supply the bulk of consumer goods to our people. The technique of handicraft production has a national characteristic. At present our handicraft production makes up 59 per cent of the industrial and handicraft output taken together, and caters for 465,000 toilers. The value of handicraft output is twice that of state industry output and the number of handicraftsmen is four times over the number of workers in state enterprises (statistical figures by the end of 1957). The transformation of the small handicraft production into big socialist production is also a path to make the handicraftsmen willingly organize themselves into co-operatives and improve technique in order to ensure the production of consumer goods to meet the ever increasing needs of the people, secure jobs and the improvement of living conditions for the artisans, and the rational division of labour in our economy. We must help handicraftsmen organize themselves, improve technique and gradually mechanize their bases of production into industrial bases, utilizing machines in production. The experience gained by China in the building of small industrial bases everywhere has helped us realize the latent potentialities of our handicrafts in the process of industrial devel-
opment in town and countryside.
In a country where the economy of small production still exists, the small traders are still indispensable in distribution. Their scattered trade is very favourable to the consumption of the people. In the conditions of a scattered countryside, with difficult communications and an insufficient network of state trade and purchasing and marketing co-operatives, they have the effect of impelling the rural economy forward. At present, in North Vietnam they are still in great number (over 200,000 households), their income is not high---sometimes below 30,000 dongs a month(lO) each, that is below the minimum wage of a low-level producer. They are toiling people, their transformation must go through the development of production, drawing them into various economic branches and production bases. They cannot be considered as the main object to be transformed like the capitalist industrialists and traders, so with regard to them as well as the peasants and handicraftsmen, we must make them realize the advantage in organizing themselves, and embarking in socialist production, and engaging in it of their own free will. They also belong to the family of toiling masses, socialism is also their source of happiness, and the guarantee of their bright future. Previously they went together with the working class, and contributed an active part to the insurrection to seize power; today in socialist revolution, they are also an integral part of the socialist toiling masses.
Therefore in the advance to socialism, we must provide the small traders and handicraftsmen with jobs to keep them up, this is also our Party mass line in socialist revolution.
It would be an unwise policy of ours if we reduced the masses of small traders and handicraftsmen to unemployment or raise difficulties in their trade. While advancing to socialism we must see to developing production, helping the small producers realize the advantage of big production and rational division of social labour; and ensure the subsistence and job to the masses, and must not act like the capitalists who run after profit without the least attention paid to the producers' fate.
The forces of the masses in socialist revolution and construction also include the revolutionary intellectuals, the intellectuals of the
12 13workers and peasants. Socialist revolution closely links with the rapid scientific and technical development, the all-round cultural development, to which the intellectuals give a very important contribution. But like any other revolution the cultural revolution must be made by the masses. The Party's slogan "to raise the cultural level of the workers and peasants and inculcate the worker-peasant standpoint on the intellectuals" is to set the problem of building up and developing culture on the basis of the toiling masses. This is also the Party mass line.
In short, according to our mass viewpoint socialist revolution is also the work of the toiling masses. Workers, peasants, urban and rural toilers, and revolutionary intellectuals, all belong to the family of the toiling masses. Only by paying attention to their aspirations and interests, can we rouse their determination and enthusiasm, and develop their inexhaustible creativeness to overcome all difficulties and speed up the revolution.
Only by relying on the enthusiasm and revolutionary determination of the toiling masses and the powerful pressure of the revolutionary movement they wage, can we make the national bourgeois willingly transform themselves and gradually join the toilers' rank.
In socialist revolution the unified front includes the toiling classes, and the self-transformed national bourgeois who have joined the rank of the toilers. It also includes all the brother nationalities living on an equal footing in Vietnam, the believers of various religions, and the Vietnamese residing abroad, who with concerted efforts build an abundant and happy life.
Any policy weakening this front is an obstacle, sometimes a danger to socialist revolution.
At present our country is temporarily partitioned in two zones, with two opposing political and economic systems.
North Vietnam is gradually advancing to socialism but South Vietnam is under the U.S.-Diem rule. The South Vietnam people are making the national democratic revolution. Though the present situation and condition differ from the past, the revolution in South Vietnam still follows the general law of national democratic revolution. Our Party's mass viewpoint in the national
democratic revolution still suits South Vietnam in the main.
President Ho Chi Minh has often taught us: Revolution is the work of the masses to liberate themselves. The force of the masses is invincible.
The history of the world as well as that of our country have proved that once the force of the masses is roused, organized, and determined to rise up, it can overcome every difficulty, and do every work.
At present in the world, under the leadership of the communist parties, thousands of millions of people are heroically struggling for peace and socialism, a happy life and a glorious future. It is precisely this great force which has stayed the imperialists' hand and made them recoil. No doubt, the future belongs to the toiling people.
At home, under the leadership of the Party, the toiling masses have done their best in every respect to fulfil the state plan and contribute to the building of socialism as a basis of the struggle for national reunification, and have achieved many brilliant successes.
It is our firm belief that grasping thoroughly the working class' mass standpoint and viewpoint and Marxism-Leninism, our entire Party which is determined to rely upon the toiling masses, rouse their consciousness, and develop their boundless creativeness, will certainly take our socialist revolution and national reunification to a glorious success.
14 15Principles and Methods of Revolutionary Action
The victory of the revolution depends primarily on a correct determination of the general orientation and strategic objective, as well as the specific orientation and objective for each period. But just as important as defining the orientation and objective is the problem of how to carry them into effect once such decisions have been made. What road should be followed? What forms should be adopted? What measures should be used? Experience has shown that a revolutionary movement may mark time, or even fail, not for lack of clearly defined orientations and objectives, but essentially because there have been no appropriate principles and methods of revolutionary action.
Methods of revolutionary action are devised to defeat the enemy of the revolution, and in the most advantageous way, so that the revolution may attain its ends as quickly as possible. Here one also needs wisdom as well as courage; it is not only a science, but also an art.
Decisions over methods of revolutionary action require, more than in any other field, that the revolutionary maintain the highest creative spirit. Revolution is creation; it cannot succeed without imagination and ingenuity. There has never been nor will there ever be a unique formula for making a revolution that is suited to all situations. One given method may be adaptable to a certain
Written on the occasion of the 40th Anniversary of the establishment of the Indochinese Communist Party (1970).
17country but unsuitable in another. A correct method in certain times and circumstances may be erroneous in other situations. Everything depends on the concrete historical conditions. Lenin said: "Marxism demands an absolutely historical examination of the question of the forms of struggle. To treat this question apart from the concrete historical situation betrays a failure to understand the rudiments of dialectical materialism .... To attempt to answer yes or no to the question whether any particular means of struggle should be used, without making a detailed examination of the concrete situation of the given moment at the given stage of its development, means completely to abandon the Marxist position."(1)
A method or form of struggle can be considered best and most appropriate only when it fully satisfies the requirements of a given concrete situation, is thoroughly suited to the conditions in which it is applied, raises the courage of the revolutionary and progressive forces and rouses them to action, permits a thorough exploitation of the enemy's weaknesses, and for all these reasons, is likely to bring about the greatest success possible, given the relation of forces prevailing at the moment.
As a result of more than a century of revolutionary struggle, the international proletariat has amassed a great wealth of valuable experience. If one has mastered the concrete historical perspective and has taken the peculiar traits of one's country into full account, then the knowledge gained about revolutionary experiences in other nations allows for greater revolutionary inventiveness in one's own country. While carrying on the struggle, our Party knows how to enrich its fund of revolutionary knowledge and develop continuously its imagination and skill in political leadership---not only by constantly assessing, summing up, and improving upon the experience gained in our revolution, but also through attentive, selective and careful study of the revolutionary experience acquired in other countries, with full attention paid to the specific conditions of the Vietnamese revolution.
It is a matter of principle that either in the daily policies or in the practice of revolutionary struggle, in whatever way and under whatever circumstances they are carried out, a revolutionary should never lose sight of the final goal. If one considers the fight
for small daily gains and immediate targets as ``everything'' and views the final goal as ``nothing'' (" to sacrifice the future of the movement to the present"), then one displays the worst kind of opportunism which can only result in keeping the popular masses in eternal servitude.
However, it is by no means sufficient to comprehend only the final objective. While keeping firmly in mind the revolutionary goal, the art of revolutionary leadership lies in knowing how to win judiciously step by step. Revolution is the work of millions of popular masses standing up to overthrow the ruling classes, which command powerful means of violence together with other material and spiritual forces. That is why a revolution is always a long-term process. From the initial steps to the final victory, a revolution necessarily goes through many difficult and complex stages of struggle full of twists and bends, clearing one obstacle after another and gradually changing the relation of forces between the revolution and the counter-revolution until overwhelming superiority is achieved over the ruling classes. To push the enemy back and gain one success after another for the revolution, and proceed to the total defeat of the enemy and a complete victory for the revolution, is a law of revolutionary struggle.
Throughout the long road leading to the final goal, one should never fail to consider the concrete conditions of the struggle in each period. When and in what circumstances are the masses going into action? How are the various social forces aligned? What are the enemy's strong and weak points? How is he maneuvering and what are his aims? Lenin used to demand that the Communists carefully study and view with the greatest objectivity not only the situation at home but also all elements of international economics and politics, and the relation between all class forces within their country and throughout the world. Without taking full notice of all these factors of changing concrete reality, a revolutionary may at best perceive the ultimate objective of the struggle, but he will have no command over the means to achieve it. He will not find the ways, methods and practical means to reach that goal and may commit serious errors in his strategic and tactical guidance of the revolution.
18 19Knowing how to win step by step in a judicious manner means that in various situations one sets the most appropriate concrete objectives and, on the strength of objective laws, directs the fight in such a way as to achieve the maximum success. This approach paves the way for further revolutionary advances and opens up certain prospects for ultimate victory. These steps have been taken in our revolution.
The triumph of the August Revolution would not have been possible had it not been preceded by the 1930-31 and 1936-39 movements, and the patriotic upsurge of 1940-45.
The greatest achievement of the 1930-31 movement---a gain that the subsequent atrocious white terror of the imperialists and feudalists failed to obliterate---lies in the fact that the proletariat, represented by our Party, asserted in practice the claim and ability to lead the revolution, and that it infused the peasantry with an unshakable faith in the proletariat. Thus the worker-peasant masses were inspired with confidence in their immense revolutionary stamina. The 1930-31 movement also exposed the adventurism, reformism, tendencies to compromise, vacillations and half-- heartedness of the national bourgeoisie and petty bourgeoisie, as well as demonstrating the sound revolutionary line of the proletariat and the huge revolutionary capabilities of the workers and peasants. Furthermore, it revealed to our entire people the extremely reactionary nature of the landlord class and comprador bourgeoisie. That first successful step was decisively significant for the whole subsequent development of the revolution. In fact, had it not been for the fierce class conflicts of 1930-31 in which the peasants and workers displayed extraordinary revolutionary energy, the upsurge of 1936-39 would not have been possible.
The period of 1936-39, in which legal and semi-legal actions were coupled with clandestine and illegal activities, seldomly occurs in a colonial country. When the Popular Front came to power in France, the Party viewed this event as a favorable occasion to push the revolution one step forward. It was able to utilize this opportunity because it had built solid and fundamental combat positions beginning in 1930. Acting upon Lenin's recommendation, "concrete political tasks must be presented in concrete circumstances,"(2) the
Party set as the immediate tasks for the 1936-39 period the struggle against the reactionary colonialists (not as yet the defeat of colonialist rule as a whole), fascism and war, while demanding democratic liberties, a decent standard of living, and peace. The Party was fully aware that these demands were by no means the final goals, that one could never radically change the social order through reform. Only by eventually smashing the imperialist and feudalist rule through violence and winning power for the people would the revolutionary objective be achieved. However, Lenin himself said that without the democratic liberties brought about by the February Revolution of 1917 it would have been difficult to start the large-scale mass struggle that led to the October Revolution. We may refer in similar terms to the effect of the 1936-39 democratic movement on the subsequent development of the August Revolution. The intense mass agitation during this period was without precedent under French rule. Through a variety of flexible forms of organization and activity, including our utilization of the " chambers of people's representatives" and the "colonial councils" set up by the French colonists, the Party mobilized and gave political education to millions of people, especially workers and peasants. The political struggles swept through town and countryside. They spread from factories, plantations and mines to villages and hamlets and created conditions for leading the masses into the new, fierce battles of the 1940-45 period.
After the outbreak of the Second World War, the French colonialists capitulated and offered Indochina to the Japanese fascists, putting a two-fold yoke on our people's necks. During this period our Party held that oppression, exploitation and war would incite the people to ever more vigorous revolutionary action; the revolution would inevitably flare up. On President Ho Chi Minh's initiative, it founded the Viet Minh Front to bring together the broadest range of national democratic forces. At the same time, the Party began building revolutionary bases, and the first armed units started a "fight the French, drive out the Japanese" movement, expanded guerrilla warfare, and extended the partial insurrections. When, as the Party had foreseen, the Japanese betrayed the French, it made a quick shift and initiated a movement to resist the Japan-
20 21ese and save the nation. This was a period of seething and vigorous mass mobilization in which political forces developed intensively in all areas---rural and urban, plain and hill-forest---together with the armed revolutionary forces. Widespread preparations were made for the forthcoming general insurrection.
The glorious triumph of the August Revolution was not only the result of the national liberation movement of the 1940-45 period but also the outcome of a revolutionary process fostered and prepared through the two full dress rehearsals of 1930-31 and 1936-39. A revolutionary struggle unfolds steadily in all spheres of social life---political, economic and cultural. Hence, constant success in each area of combat requires the mobilization and organization of the masses to undermine the enemy's successive policies and thwart every one of his schemes and maneuvers. It is necessary to point out and attain at all costs every objective possible in a given period or during a specific battle, thereby impelling the movement forward and bringing it to a higher level. Nothing succeeds like success, and each success in a given field stimulates the struggle in other fields. Starting from scratch, the movement develops to ever higher levels, driving the enemy from pillar to post, consolidating its partial gains and relentlessly expanding the revolutionary battlefield in the direction of total victory. In the Vietnamese revolution, the movement toward the seizure of power shows the distinguishing feature of an evolution from partial to general insurrections. This is indeed an application of the method of "winning step by step" to the specific conditions of our revolution.
In short, this method expresses the unity between steadiness of purpose and a clear understanding of changing concrete reality. It is the art of dialectically combining firmness of principle with flexibility of policy and applying to the work of revolutionary leadership the law of development from gradual changes to "leaps." One must show boldness and determination in setting new tasks and devising new plans. One must be able to foresee, at least in a broad outline, the results of forthcoming actions and of all possible trends of development of the objective situation. In practice, new factors and possibilities keep emerging, so that one must take them into account by changing or correcting actions and quickly working out
new plans to insure that the strategic and tactical guidance keeps pace with the changing situation. Only then is it possible to pursue the fight without hesitation, a gradual process---interspersed with leaps, big and small, in the revolutionary movement and in the relations of forces---toward the crucial leap to final victory.
Lenin firmly opposed subjectivism and voluntarism, as well as all forms of political passivity. He required that the Communist parties work out their policies and tactics in such a way as to " combine complete scientific sobriety in the analysis of the objective state of affairs and the objective course of evolution with the most emphatic recognition of the importance of the revolutionary energy, revolutionary creative genius and revolutionary initiative of the masses."(3)
A revolution is not a coup d'etat; it is not the outcome of plots. It is the work of the masses. Hence, the mobilization and rallying of the mass forces, the establishment and expansion of the political army of the revolution, is a fundamental and decisive problem. This task must be approached in a vigorous and sustained way both throughout the period when a revolutionary situation has not yet appeared and the period when such a situation has arisen and matured. To realize this task, one must mingle and be active with the masses in everyday life, even within enemy organizations. One must keep abreast of the situation in the enemy's camp as well as ours, correctly appraise all schemes, moves and capabilities of the enemy, accurately assess all changes developing in his ranks, and at the same time be fully aware of the state of mind, wishes and potential power of the masses. In this way one can put forward appropriately incisive and timely slogans which will arouse the broad masses to action, direct them from lower to higher forms of struggle, ceaselessly heighten their political consciousness and help expand the army of the revolution both in scope and in depth.
On the road to the seizure of power, the only weapon available to the revolutionary masses is organization. The hallmark of the revolutionary movement led by the proletariat is its high organizational standards. All activities seeking to bring the masses to the point where they will rise up and overthrow the ruling classes revolve around this point: organize, organize, organize. The pur-
22 23pose of political propaganda is the organization of the masses. Only by organizing them in some way will conditions be created for educating them and building up the immense strength of the revolution. Once organized, their power will significantly increase. The masses are to be organized for combat. Conversely, through combat they are further organized and educated, and the revolutionary forces are expanded. Therefore, propaganda, organization and struggle go hand in hand and have as a common purpose the formation and growth of the political army of the masses in preparation for the decisive leap.
In every period, our Party has resourcefully organized the masses by all appropriate means and in all suitable forms. The Party knows how to interest the masses in current political events, big or small, and mobilize them to drive the enemy into confusion and passivity while building and expanding our own forces. Even when its activity requires the strictest secrecy, the Party has established varied, broad and flexible organizational forms to rally the masses for revolutionary action and guide them from lower to higher forms of struggle, thereby educating them and enlarged the revolutionary ranks. Always taking illegal action as its foundation, the Party skillfully combines it with all possibilities for legal action. In a given situation the Party may start an all-out drive for legality. It does not deceive itself with any illusions about the `legal'' road to power nor spread such illusions among the masses, but seeks to provide a broader scope for the education and rallying of the masses and to augment the influence of the revolution. At such times the Party must oppose indecision and timidity just as it must guard against and combat legalism, prevent the violation of its principle of organizational secrecy, and continue building and expanding the Party and the core organizations of the masses. If one does not guard against and fight legalism in time, this situation may lead to very dangerous events, the enemy attacks the revolution, and the Party has to change quickly and completely to illegal action.
Organization and struggle, struggle and organization, again struggle---one battle leads to another. Once the masses have gone into battle, they will grow more politically conscious, and their
experience will show them the truth and teach them which way to act---hence, the particular importance of slogans. The art of giving strategic and tactical guidance to the revolution while directing a struggle is most significantly expressed in sharp-edged and relevant slogans that keep pace with the situation.
One should not hold the oversimplified view that economic slogans are reformist while only political ones are revolutionary. There can be political slogans with a reformist character and economic ones that carry a revolutionary content. The question is: when, in what connection, and with what aim is a given slogan put forward. A genuine revolutionary party that is decisively devoted to the final goal of the revolution can in one way or another put the seal of the revolution on all slogans and all forms of organization and struggle, including minimally political ones that are necessary for rallying the masses in a situation not yet favorable for all-out revolutionary actions.
Throughout all periods and especially the period preceding the August Revolution of 1945, the Party has skillfully combined action and propaganda slogans to link immediate targets with fundamental objectives. A slogan relevant to a concrete situation makes it possible to arouse a whole movement. One vivid example is the slogan, "Get the stocks of rice and stamp our famine," put forward by our Party in the preparatory period for the August Revolution. It was issued at a time of terrible famine in Bac Bo and northern Trung Bo. It answered the most urgent aspirations of the masses, fomenting their anger and hatred and arousing them to advance with intense revolutionary fervor toward insurrection and the seizure of power.
A distinction should be drawn between propaganda and action slogans to avoid involving the masses in decisive battles either too soon or too late. Both kinds of slogans must continually be altered to conform to the evolution of the struggle. Action slogans closely connected with the daily effort must especially show extreme flexibility, even changing with each hour. As the situation develops, one must gradually raise the level of action slogans, and when the right time comes turn previous propaganda slogans into ones for direct and resolute action. It is dangerous for the revolution to lead
24 25the masses into decisive battles either too late or too soon. Under all circumstances, the most important and basic guarantee against blunders is a thorough grasp of concrete reality, both in general analysis and in every decision for action. In a revolutionary period, events develop very rapidly and intricately. Lenin pointed out: 'The substitution of the abstract for the concrete is one of the greatest and most dangerous sins in the revolution. "(4) He castigated those who, at a sharp turn in history, fail to adapt themselves to the new situation and cling to old slogans which were correct yesterday but are meaningless today.
For a revolution to break out and be successful, a revolutionary situation must prevail. A revolutionary situation is the product of the combination of a series of necessary, objective and subjective factors. One should guard against the tendency to wait passively for the revolution, as well as the hot-headed inclination to "skip intermediate stations.''
Before and after the First World War, revolutionary situations and the outbreaks and triumphs of revolutions were generally connected in one way or another with the world wars provoked by imperialism. However, one should not draw the conclusion that war is either the natural source or necessary condition of revolution and that consequently one should wait for war to start before making a revolution. A revolution is first and foremost the result of class contradictions that are exacerbated to the extreme in a given country. Formerly, when imperialist wars were inevitable, they had the objective effect of accelerating the revolutionary crises in various countries. Taking advantage of this situation, the Communists advocated the "transformation of imperialist wars into revolutionary civil wars.''
The present international situation differs radically from that before and after the First World War. Today, the world socialist system and the forces battling against imperialism to create a socialist society are shaping the essential content, orientation and characteristic features of the historical development of society. The possibility of breaking the weak links in the remaining parts of the imperialist chain has increased to an unprecedented degree at a time when it becomes practically feasible to prevent a world war. The
fundamental interest of the proletariat, the people and the nations of the world lies in safeguarding world peace while promoting the revolution in various countries. These two objectives are organically linked together; each is the premise of the other. Both are perfectly attainable once the Communists, thoroughly conscious of the strategically offensive position of the world revolution, are successful in setting up a united front bringing together all currents of the world revolution, all forces fighting for peace, national independence, democracy and socialism, and are resolved to crush all imperialist aggression, repel every one of imperialism's belligerent moves and schemes, drive it back step by step, destroy it piecemeal, and eventually overthrow it entirely.
The revolution in the South of our country is an example of a correct way to march forward. It proves that a revolution can still break out and be victorious in the absence of a world war, and even as world peace has to be defended. Indeed, the intensification of the anti-imperialist revolution, far from being incompatible with the defense of peace, is proving in practice a fundamental way to attack imperialism and thus effectively safeguard world peace. Conversely, the prevention of world war and the defense of peace is also a very important way to assault imperialism and create more favorable objective conditions for the progress of the revolution in all countries.
The South Vietnamese revolution also proves that a fascist dictatorship cannot prevent the outbreak of a revolution. When the puppet administration in the South resorted to the most barbarous fascist measures against the people, this meant that they had suffered a crucial defeat in the political field. An explosive situation was developing which would surely break out into a revolution, as it did.
The existence of a revolutionary situation means that the problem of the seizure of power is immediately at hand. The manner of winning power depends on the specific conditions of each country. However, under all circumstances the only road to power lies in revolution, not reform.
Revolution is the climax of class struggle. It is always accomplished through a violent confrontation of the oppressed and ruling
26 27classes which settles the problem of political power. Violence may manifest and exert itself in various forms. In a nutshell, we may say, revolutionary violence must rely on two kinds of force, armed and political, and include two forms of struggle, military and political, and a combination of these two. The experience of the Vietnamese revolution demonstrates that in a successful revolution one must have armed forces in addition to political forces, and must know how to carry out clever military and political action according to the concrete situation prevailing in a given place and time. If the revolutionary forces, including the armed forces, are not prepared, they will not be able to resist the fierce onslaught of the enemy. However, the use of violence does not rest solely with the armed forces, nor does it only assume the form of military struggle. Political forces and political struggle are indispensable, for success cannot be won by military action and armed forces alone. It goes without saying that not all forms of political struggle are violent. The only actions that may be considered so are the revolutionary actions undertaken by the masses outside the bounds of the state laws of the ruling class and directly aimed at overthrowing the ruling class and seizing power for the people, once the question of political power has been raised. Revolutionary violence aimed at overthrowing the ruling class must necessarily be the violence of the broad masses who are oppressed and exploited. Under the leadership of the Party, they can display their strength and determination in countless ways. The best and most revolutionary method is the one that can create and organize those forms of violence most appropriate for the circumstances and can successfully mobilize the power of the masses against the ruling class, bringing about victory for the revolution under the most favorable conditions. Reluctance in starting a military struggle when the need arises or engaging in such an effort under unfavorable circumstances is a serious mistake.
In the August Revolution, our Party creatively applied the law of violent revolution and insurrection to gain power. The August Revolution combined political and military struggle. It combined elaborate preparation of the political and military forces with quick seizure of the opportune moment for inciting the masses to over-
throw the imperialists and feudalists. Originating and developing in the vast revolutionary movement of the masses, the armed units for national salvation and liberation, whose prestige far outstripped their numbers and the extent of their engagements, had contributed significantly to the upsurge of the patriotic masses in the period from 1941---45. After the Soviet Union's resounding victory over the Kwangtung army of the Japanese fascists had forced them into an unconditional surrender, the Party quickly seized that unique opportunity to launch a general insurrection. It relied on the political forces of the broad rural and urban masses in combination with the revolutionary armed forces, smashing the enemy's key organs in the capital and other cities, liquidating his whole administrative network in the countryside, and seized power throughout the country.
One must have a thorough grasp of revolutionary violence, build overwhelming superiority for the revolution, and unite the broadest masses of the people on the basis of a truly firm and strong worker-peasant alliance. At the same time, one must strive to divide and isolate the enemy to the utmost, cripple his power of resistance, smash the state apparatus of the ruling class, and establish the people's power.
Besides the preparation of political and military forces, a very important problem revealed by the experience of all revolutions is the seizure of the opportune moment. This moment may be brought about either by revolutionary forces at home or by conditions abroad. Without sufficient revolutionary forces, it is impossible either to create a favorable opportunity or to take timely advantage of one should it develop. Therefore, it is crucial to exert a sustained effort to tip the scales in our favor and achieve decisive superiority regarding both the position and strength of the revolution. When will the fire of the revolution flare up? What spark will set off the powder keg? Once the revolution has acquired firm position and strength, and the enemy has been driven to the wall, the daily political and social life will supply us with every favorable opportunity and circumstance to encourage a great movement. The decision only depends on the leaders' perspicacity and political ability. Lenin remarked that history as a whole, and
28 29the history of revolutions in particular, is always richer in content, more varied, multiform, lively and ingenious, than is imagined by even the best parties and the most class-conscious vanguards of the most advanced classes. In the course of the revolution, it often suffices that the leaders fully possess a fundamental orientation, certain basic factors and conditions, and the boldness to act. As action evolves, possibilities and trends of development will reveal themselves. The boundless creative power of the masses who make history will provide us with the orientation and methods for solving all practical problems.
The Working Class and Socialist Industrialization
Comrades and friends,
On behalf of the Central Committee of the Vietnam Worker's Party I extend my warmest and most cordial greetings to the Second National Congress of the Vietnam Federation of Trade Unions and through it to the glorious working class all over our country.
Also on behalf of the Vietnam Workers' Party, the Vietnamese working class and people, I warmly welcome the delegates of The World Federation of Trade Unions, The trade unions of the brother socialist countries, The fraternal French General Confederation of Labour, and the trade union organizations of the friendly Afro-Asian countries, who have come to take part in the present session of our National Congress of Trade Unions, and through you convey my greetings of solidarity and my best wishes to the working class and people of the brother socialist countries, the fraternal French working class and people, the working class and people of the Afro-Asian countries, and the working class and toiling people all over the world.
Comrades,
The present Congress is held at a time when the situation of the revolution in our country is undergoing changes of great importance.
Speech at the Second National Congress of the Vietnam Federation of Trade Unions held in February 1961.
30 31It is held immediately after the successful conclusion of the Third National Congress of our Party. In application of the universal principles of Marxism-Leninism to the practice of Vietnamese revolution, the Party Congress has mapped out a correct line for the working class and all the people of our country to strive to take the North rapidly, vigorously and steadily to socialism and struggle for the liberation of our beloved South, to advance toward the peaceful reunification of our motherland on the basis of independence and democracy, to build a peaceful, united, independent, democratic, strong and prosperous Vietnam, and effectively to contribute to the strengthening of the socialist camp and to the safeguarding of peace in South-East Asia and the world.
In the light of the resolutions of the Party Congress, people throughout our country are enthusiastically and resolutely fulfilling the historical tasks set by it.
In the North, the socialist revolution and construction have recorded big achievements and are growing vigorously. We are entering a new period on the road to socialism.
In the South, the revolutionary struggle for national liberation of our compatriots is gaining ground with buoyant mettle and shaking the gloomy U.S.-Diem regime to the root. Though still encountering numerous difficulties and obstacles this struggle has an extremely bright prospect.
Our working class is the class that leads the revolution throughout our country. History has entrusted it with the glorious mission of liberating the nation and leading our country to socialism and communism. In the light of the resolutions of the Party National Congress, the present Congress of trade unions will certainly show the working class and trade union organizations the practical tasks and work to be done to transform the Party's line into the will, determination and deeds of the broad masses of workers, employees, and mobilize all of them to work heart and soul for the successful fulfillment of their glorious historical mission.
Dear comrades,
The present task of building socialism in the North is of most decisive significance for the whole development of the Vietnamese revolution and for the struggle for national reunification.
Since the restoration of peace and the complete liberation of the North we have stepped into the period of transition to socialism. We have completed the economic rehabilitation, the Three-Year Plan for economic transformation and development and for cultural development (1958-60) was successfully achieved, bringing about big revolutionary changes in the economy and life in the North of our country.
The socialist transformation of agriculture, handicrafts, private capitalist industry and commerce and small traders has won successes of decisive importance. Eighty-five per cent of peasant households are members of low-level agricultural co-operatives, 87 per cent of artisans and 82 per cent of small traders have joined co-operative organizations of various forms, the private capitalist industry and commerce as a whole have been transformed into joint state-private undertakings or co-operatives. The system of exploitation of man by man has been basically abolished and the system of individual ownership of the small producers which occupied a great part of the national economy has been turned into the system of socialist collective ownership.
On the basis of the new relations of production, the industrial and agricultural production in the past few years have also developed rapidly. The average annual rate of increase of the value of agricultural output in the Three-Year Plan was 6 per cent, of industry 21.7 per cent, and of industry turning out means of production alone 35 per cent.
The old agriculture with a monoculture is being gradually turned into a comprehensive agriculture with many branches, craft and many varieties of products.
Our industry consisted in the past only of a few small repair workshops, raw material extracting enterprises, and enterprises for preliminary processing of products; but we have now built up a light industry capable of supplying our people with the greater part of commodities. The first undertakings of heavy industry such as engineering, metallurgy, electricity, fuel, building materials, etc. have been initially set up and are developing. The industrial ratio in the aggregate value of industrial and agricultural output has increased from 30.4 per cent in 1957 to 41.3 per cent in 1960.
32 33Efforts have been made to speed up the development of culture, education, science and technology, the training and fostering of technicians and skilled workers. The working class in the North has swollen rapidly. The material and cultural life of our people has been substantially improved.
These great achievements are proofs of the superiority of the socialist regime in the North, at the same time they constitute a great encouragement for our countrymen in the South. They create favourable conditions for the socialist laws widely to bring into play their effects, enabling the North to advance more rapidly and more powerfully on the road of socialist development.
These successes have been obtained thanks first of all to the patriotjsm and socialist ardour of our working class and people, and also thanks to the wholehearted assistance of the working classes and peoples of the brother socialist countries, first and foremost the Soviet Union and China. Availing ourselves of this opportunity we sincerely thank the working classes and peoples of the brother countries for their disinterested and generous aid.
At present, the socialist construction in the North is entering a new period.
The resolution of the Third National Congress of our Party has pointed out that when socialist transformation scores decisive successes socialist construction and industrialization will become our central task. It is precisely our Five-Year Plan (1961-1965) that opens up this period. The principal aim of this plan is to build the material and technical basis of socialism, carry out socialist industrialization and complete socialist transformation.
At present, we are facing a big contradiction in the process of the development of the socialist construction in the North. We have established advanced relations of production---socialist relations of production with two important forms of ownership: entire people's ownership and collective ownership, but the material and technical basis of the national economy is still very weak. Productivity is low as production still relies mostly on manual labour. The ratio of the output of modern industry in the national economy amount to only 20 per cent. With an improved but still backward farming method, agriculture which depends a great deal
on nature occupies the greater part in our production. This situation is setting the economy of the North an urgent task: rapidly to accomplish socialist industrialization, and to build the material and technical foundations of socialism. A socialist economy cannot be built on the basis of a backward manual production but necessarily on the basis of a large mechanized industry. Only with a large mechanized industry can we rapidly raise labour productivity, ensure continuous enlarged reproduction and bring socialism to a complete success.
If we do not build up for our national economy a modern material and technical basis, and equip the various branches of industry, agriculture, capital construction, communications and transport, etc. with machines, to replace manual labour by mechanized labour, our economy cannot, in essence, be considered as a socialist economy.
That is precisely why our Party regards industrialization as the central task throughout the period of transition to socialism.
We have every reason to put forth the task of industrialization of our country. We have enough natural resources and labouring power. Besides, we have the powerful socialist camp with an advanced industry. With the assistance and close co-operation of our brother countries, first and foremost, the great Soviet Union and great China, the valiant working class and toiling people of our country will certainly be able to establish rapidly a national industry in accordance with our possibilities and conditions.
Our policy on industrialization consists in building a balanced and modern socialist economy which combines industry with agriculture and which has heavy industry as its basis, in giving priority to the rational development of heavy industry and at the same time striving to develop agriculture and light industry aimed at transforming our backward agricultural country into a country endowed with a modern industry, a modern agriculture, and an advanced culture and science.
To provide modern technique for the various branches of national economy it is definitely indispensable to build a heavy industry with a machine-building industry as its core. At present, an important part of our machines and equipment are supplied by the
34 35brother countries. However, for the basic and lasting benefit of our economy, we must gradually move toward self-supply for the great part of machines and equipment required by various branches of the national economy, otherwise we cannot have the initiative in the development of our national economy. Therefore in carrying out industrialization we must unfailingly stick to the principle of giving priority to the development of heavy industry.
Our industrial system must be built rationally. We need not necessarily set up all the branches of heavy industry, only the basic ones that our country must necessarily build and has conditions to develop in order to provide a material and technical basis required by industry, agriculture, capital construction, transport and communications, etc., and to direct these branches in satisfying the people's requirements in food, housing, education and circulation.
We do not have to wait until heavy industry is in full bloom before stepping up light industry and food industry. While our heavy industry is not yet developed, thanks to the assistance and co-operation of the brother socialist countries we can even base ourselves on our natural resources and our people's requirements to develop light industry and food industry, ensure the supply of staple commodities to the people and the requirements of exports.
The aid and co-operation of the brother countries is of paramount importance to our industrialization, however we must not rely too much on it but mainly on our own efforts, on the development of our national economy, on the endeavour and sacrifices of our people. We proceed from an agricultural economy to carry out industrialization. Consequently agriculture must serve as the basis for the development of industry and in its turn the developed industry becomes the main force, the lever for the development of all branches of the national economy.
Agriculture is a source supplying foodstuffs and raw materials to industry, and a market for industrial goods. Our tropical agriculture is an important source of exports in exchange for machines and equipment needed by industry. The developed agriculture also contributes to accumulating funds for industrialization.
Industry will have no basis to develop rapidly and favourably if agriculture does not develop all-sidedly, vigorously and steadily.
Vice-versa, if industry is not developed agriculture cannot expand sufficiently and vigorously.
At present, agricultural co-operativization at lower levels is completed in the main, but the material and technical basis of agriculture is still weak, labour productivity has increased but a little, as a result the co-operatives are not yet firmly consolidated. Only by expanding agricultural production on a large scale, using improved farming implements, then gradually modern machines and technique, can socialist production relations in the countryside be firmly established, and agricultural production develop rapidly. Without a developed industry to supply improved farming implements, agricultural machines, chemical fertilizers, to build irrigation works and expand transport and communications, etc. it would be impossible to set up a modern agriculture. Of course agriculture should not wait for industry, but strive to establish and strengthen the mode of collective labour and make the best of all existing possibilities of the new productive forces created by collective labour to further step up agricultural production.
Industry and agriculture are the two basic branches of production that form the unified structure of the national economy. They are closely inter-related, rely on and impel each other and serve each other's growth.
The main task of agriculture is to ensure the supply of foodstuffs to the people and also to serve the development of industry. In return industry also has the task of serving the development of agriculture in producing means of production and consumer goods. Only in this way can industry and agriculture develop rapidly and favourably. Therefore in carrying out industrialization we must endeavour to develop both industry and agriculture and should not make light of any of them.
To implement socialist industrialization a question of prime importance to be solved is socialist accumulation. Without accumulation it will be impossible to carry out enlarged reproduction on a large scale and at a quick tempo, and to build a modern industry and modern agriculture. Production and economy are the key sources for the accumulation of funds.
In the last analysis the wealth accumulated comes from produc-
36 37tive labour. With our manual labour, backward technique and low productivity we cannot accumulate and concentrate big funds for socialist industrialization. For that reason, we have now no other way than relying ourselves on the people's revolutionary movement, and on the enthusiastic efforts of the entire people in working to increase productivity through improvement of organization of labour and of technique, making full use of the possibilities existing in production, at the same time efforts must be made to practise strict economy, resolutely to fight waste and corruption, to make use of manpower, materials and finance in the most rational way so as to be able to concentrate the necessary funds for socialist industrialization. Only by accumulating capital can we gradually endow the national economy with new technique and replace the backward manual labour by modern mechanization having a high productivity which will enable us to make bigger accumulations for the acceleration of the industrialization of our country.
Socialist industrialization is the solely correct road of development in North Vietnam. It is the only means to step up production, to rapidly expand the industrial branches to make the northern people enjoy a new, abundant and happy life and transform the North into a firm and strong base of the struggle for national reunification.
Industrialization tallies with the interests and cherished aspirations of all workers, farmers and intellectuals in our country.
The more advanced industrialization the more swollen the rank of the Vietnamese working class, the more improved the workers' livelihood and the more strengthened the leadership of the working class over the people's democratic power and other social activities. Socialist industrialization raises the value of the peasants' labour, increases the possibility of the toiling peasants to successfully combat the age-old terrible natural calamities, improve the peasants' livelihood and consolidate the worker-peasant alliance.
Socialist industrialization affords our brain workers a favourable occasion to raise their scientific and technical standard, fully develop their capabilities, put their knowledge to the service of the people and of socialist construction and swell their rank with new intellectuals of worker, peasant and other labourer stock.
Therefore, devotedly to carry out socialist industrialization is the most important task of the working class and toiling people of the North.
A trade union is a broad mass organization of the working class; all its activities should be aimed at serving this central task.
Lenin said that in general a trade union is a school of communism, and in particular it should be a school managing socialist industry (and gradually managing agriculture) for all workers and then for all toiling people.
At present, in the North the working class leads the state and economic development and transformation. The exploiting class exists no more. The workers have become masters of factories, mines, construction sites, state farms, etc. To play this role, our working class must satisfactorily manage the economy and the enterprises, develop production rapidly, raise further labour productivity, turn out more social wealth of good quality and at low price, in order to satisfy the ever increasing needs of the society. To this end, the working class must study to grasp modern technology, and the technique of production of modern industry. Lenin said that to lead the management satisfactorily it is necessary to grasp the technique of production to a high degree and to possess a certain scientific standard.
The trade union must organize the study for workers and help them study; it must find every means to raise their technical and cultural level. The cadres of the organizational section and the trade union must also study to firmly acquaint themselves with the knowledge and technique of production in order effectively to take part in the management of production and of the economy, in the elaboration and fulfilment of state plans, and to carry out their task of economic management school for the working class.
Over the last few years, thanks to the efforts made by the working class and people of our country and to the wholehearted assistance of the brother countries, we have built in the North 172 centrally-run state enterprises and more than 600 local enterprises. This is a very great achievement. However, owing to the low technical standard of our cadres and workers, the yield of machines and equipment is still low, averaging less than 50 per cent, the dura-
38 39tion of machines is not fully elaborated and correctly applied, thus causing damage and waste to machines and equipment, and even labour accident. These are mistakes and shortcomings which must be overcome.
A modern industry requires a scientific labour organization and management and a severe discipline, however our competence in these respects is still low. In our enterprises, the management of labour is not satisfactory, discipline is loose, waste of time prevails, responsibility is lacking in the protection of public property, waste and corruption are still rife; irrational regulations in the management of enterprises are not corrected in time; co-ordination is still loose between centrally-run enterprises and branches and the local ones; the business accounting system is not fully carried out, the elaboration of economic targets and technical norms is not widely applied in all enterprises.
Over the last few years, a campaign for the participation of factory and office workers in the management of enterprises has made it possible to raise their sense of being masters and has initially bettered the regulations in the organization and management of these enterprises. At present in state enterprises, congresses have been held, involving a great many office and factory workers, to discuss the situation of production and the carrying out of the plans. These are good changes. From now on, we must develop the success achieved in order constantly to improve our management, correctly apply the principle of democratic centralism in this management, fully apply the regime put forth by our Party, consisting in the management of the enterprise by the director under the leadership of the Party committee, with the participation of the workers.
The working class is duty-bound to transform the society and to this end it must constantly transform itself. The advance of industrialization will swell the rank of the working class by the admittance of new workers who were peasants, pupils, poor townsfolk or belonged to other labouring sections. This is an inevitable phenomenon. But these new workers bring in with them non-proletarian ideas of their sections of origin. The factory and office workers who lived in the old society have been badly influenced by the
thinkings of the exploiting class and other non-proletarian ideologies. That is why an important regular task of the trade union is to raise the socialist consciousness of the working class, and inculcate upon it new socialist ideology and ethics, such as the sense of being masters, love of labour and respect of public property, collectivism, mutual class solidarity, respect of labour discipline, etc., the trade union must energetically struggle against the influence of bourgeois thinking, the petty-bourgeois ideology, the remnants of feudalist ideology and other non-proletarian thinkings. The trade union must help intellectuals transform themselves further in order to become the true intelligentsia of the working class.
With our socialist consciousness and the revolutionary mettle of the working class, we must urge the working class enthusiastically to take part in the patriotic emulation movement, fulfil and overfulfil the state plan for economic and cultural development. The emulation movement is an important method to draw the majority of the masses into the management of production and the state. Through this movement we can rapidly heighten the sense of being masters and the socialist consciousness of the workers, raise their technical standard, fully develop their positiveness and creativeness and improve the management of production and of the enterprises in every respect. This movement is an important method to accelerate socialist construction. At present, the workers are engaged in an emulation drive to become front-rank workers, teams and brigades; this drive has brought out many emulation heroes and outstanding fighters who have displayed a great sacrificing spirit, heroism and creative labour of the working class; many innovations and initiatives have been introduced to improve organization and technique, rationalize production, raise labour productivity. Our trade union must speed up the emulation drive and transform it into a more boiling and powerful mass movement, aimed mainly at rationalizing production and improving technique. We must see to it that the innovations and inventions be popularized rapidly among the masses and we will urge the great majority of masses of workers to study and follow the examples of front-rank workers and units.
40 41A good organization of and leadership over the emulation movement will bring about a high movement of production among factory and office workers and vouch for the success of our plans. Parallel to the heightening of the socialist consciousness and revolutionary mettle of the workers, our trade unions should pay due attention to the material and spiritual interests of the working class. This is also an important factor to accelerate production. Under our regime, the improvement of the material and cultural life of the toiling people is the greatest concern of our Party and state. We have made great effort to raise the living standard of the factory and office workers: to find employment for hundreds of thousands of people, improve the wage system, organize public amenities and social insurance, etc. But we must understand that at present the living standard of our workers as well as of our people is still low and meets with many difficulties caused mainly by the low level of our production. Only by developing production and rapidly raising labour productivity, is it possible to improve rapidly our livelihood. In leading the state, our working class must pay due attention not only to the immediate interests of the whole country but also to its abiding interests, not only to the interests of the working class but also to the common interests of scores of millions of people of the North and of the country at large. To do away with the poverty of our country, we have no other alternative than to rely on our own powers, to build the country frugally and painstakingly and make the necessary accumulation of capital for socialist industrialization. We must see to the improvement of the people's life and the accumulation of funds for economic and industrial development. Our trade union must make the workers realize clearly their immediate and permanent interests, partial and common interests in order to improve their livelihood and develop their spirit of thrift and sacrifice in struggle so as to build up a bright future. On the other hand, it must develop its effectiveness in the mobilization and organization of the masses to improve their livelihood, to contribute to the betterment of the wage system, bonuses, to take part in the elaboration of hygiene regulation and safety in production, protection of labour, amenities and social insurance, improvement of food, clothing, housing, working,
entertainment, housekeeping and children's nursing of the workers and to find every way and means to overcome the difficulties encountered by factory and public workers in their livelihood.
Comrades,
In exerting its efforts to build socialism in the North our working class cannot forget that half of our country is not yet liberated. In the South our people, including the workers, are living in a state of burning heat and boiling water. The imperialists and their henchman, Ngo Dinh Diem, are carrying out a most savage fascist policy to turn our South into a U.S. colony and military base and are plotting to rekindle the war and to wreck peace in Indo-China, South-East Asia and the world. But they meet with a strong opposition on the part of our southern compatriots as a whole.
For nearly nine years now, meetings, demonstrations, parades have been held in South Vietnam, involving more than two million people, to protest against the policies of repression, terror, wage cut, dismissal of workers, land grabbing, herding of the population, house eviction, setting up of "prosperity zones" and " agricultural settlements"; to oppose forced recruitment of labourers, pressganging of soldiers, subscriptions of money, fines; to protest against Diem's dictatorship and nepotism and to compel him to resign, etc. In these political struggles the Diem clique have killed hundreds of people by very barbarous means such as disembowelling and beheading. In many localities the inhabitants have armed themselves against terrorist raids launched by the U.S.- Diem clique.
At present, blood is shed everyday on half of our beloved country. We vehemently denounce before world public opinion the unheard-of bloody crimes of the U.S.-Diem clique. We warmly acclaim the heroic struggle of the working class, toiling people and all our campatriots in the South, who are now highlighting their heroic revolutionary tradition, stubbornly fighting against the U.S. imperialists and their henchman, Ngo Dinh Diem, demanding peace, democratic liberties, improvement of the people's livelihood, independence and peaceful reunification of the Fatherland. At the same time we are duty-bound to support by all means the
42 43struggle of the working class and toiling people in the South, to stubbornly fight for the rapid peaceful reunification of the country so that North and South will be united. Despite their mad actions in the end the U.S.-Diem clique will meet with a shameful failure. Our beloved Fatherland will be completely reunified.
The U.S. imperialists commit crimes not only in the south of our country but everywhere in the world. In Laos, our neighbour, together with their henchmen they are unleashing a civil war which seriously threatens peace in Indo-China and South-East Asia, we therefore vehemently protest against this scheme of invasion and brazen intervention of the U.S. imperialists. We energetically support the just struggle waged against the U.S. imperialists and their henchmen by the Laotian people to re-establish peace in Laos and take that country to the road of peace, neutrality and national
harmony.
Of late, the U.S. imperialists and Belgian colonialists, under the cover of the U.N.O. flag, and their henchmen, have perpetrated a new crime in the Congo, killing Premier Lumumba and two other outstanding leaders of the Congolese people. Our working class and people at large are very indignant and condemn their acts. We energetically support the stubborn struggle of the Congolese people for freedom and complete national independence.
The situation in South Vietnam, Laos and the Congo has laid bare the aggressive and bellicose face of the U.S. imperialists. At present, the U.S. imperialists are the cruellest enemy of our people and the world's people. The Vietnamese working class and people have the duty to spearhead their struggle, together with the world's working class and people, against U.S. imperialism and to energetically denounce and smash all their dark designs.
Our working class is part of the great army of international proletariat. The success achieved by the Vietnamese working class is not taken apart from the support and sympathy of the working class and people of the world, first and foremost of the socialist camp. Therefore, it is an international duty for our working class to constantly strengthen its solidarity with the working class of socialist countries, of countries in Asia and Africa and in the world, to actively struggle for peace and peaceful co-existence, to whole-
heartedly support all revolutionary struggle waged by the world's working class and people for peace, national independence, democracy and socialism. A fact of paramount importance for the international communist and workers' movement during the past period was the brilliant success of the Meeting of 81 communist and workers' parties in the world. This Meeting has reviewed the rich experiences gained in the struggle waged by the workers and toiling people in the world over the last years; it has thoroughly analysed the current international situation and has outlined the correct path along which to step up the future revolutionary struggle of the world's working class and people.
Our working class and people are extremely jubilant over the great success scored by the Meeting and pledge themselves to correctly implement the resolutions of the Meeting corresponding to the particular situation of Vietnam.
At present, the world is following with great admiration and esteem the wonder made by the Soviet working class and scientists in the successful launching from a man-made satellite, of an interplanetary station to Venus. This success has opened for mankind the prospect of conquering the cosmos.
With a boundless joy and enthusiasm, we beg to convey our best wishes and congratulations to the Soviet Communist Party, government, working class and scientists.
Comrades,
The tasks lying ahead are very glorious but very heavy. Without a developed and powerful trade-union organization, it is impossible to fulfil these tasks. We must endeavour to develop the trade union more powerfully, consolidate it ideologically and organizationally, raise its position in every branch of social activities so as to transform it into a firm basis for the Party and state. We must thoroughly acquaint the trade union with production and link all its activities to production. The trade union must be brought close to the workers, learn from them and heed their opinions and aspirations. We must strive to overcome bureaucracy in trade unions which consists in standing aloof from the masses and constantly remind T.U. cadres of Lenin's behest that the trade union is not an administrative organization, but a mass organization, an
44 45educational organization. The correct method of work of the trade union can only be education and persuasion of the masses and not commandism toward the masses.
In all work, the trade union must follow the mass line, broaden democracy, foster the activists and through them step up T.U. work. The trade union must pay great attention to training and fostering cadres to satisfy the ever increasing requirement of the T.U. movement and to supply good cadres to the Party and state.
T.U. cadres must realize clearly their responsibility, serve the revolutionary work of the working class and toiling people with all their heart and soul and endeavour to temper themselves to become front-rank revolutionary fighters of the working class.
Youth and women's organizations must coordinate closely with the trade unions in the mobilization of young workers and women workers.
State organs are duty-bound to give great assistance to the T.U. in every branch of activity to correctly implement the T.U. law and the Party's and government's policies and regulations relating to the working class, toiling people and trade union.
The Party Central Committee will pay attention to strengthening the leadership of the Party at all levels over the T.U. organizations and help them fulfil their mission toward the working class.
Dear comrades and friends,
The working class in Vietnam has a very glorious revolutionary tradition. Endowed with the traditionally indomitable spirit of the world's people and revolutionary genius of the international working class, our working class has rapidly organized its vanguard party and through it, seized the sole leadership of the Vietnamese revolution for over 30 years.
The glorious success of the August Revolution, the protracted resistance war, the agrarian reform as well as of the economic rehabilitation, transformation and development during these last few years cannot be taken apart from the correct leadership of our working class and Party, it cannot be divorced from the heroic sacrifice and painstaking labour of the working class. We are very proud of this revolutionary tradition of the working class in our country.
I
Under the leadership of our Party, since its outset, the trade unions have closely united and organized the great majority of workers, urged the working class to implement all the Party's policies and recorded many achievements in all branches of activity.
We are sure that after the present T.U. congress, our working class and T.U. organizations will develop further their glorious tradition and march forward more powerfully.
We are confident that the present T.U. congress will wreak a new change in the working class and T.U. organizations in the North and give our working class a new source of energy and determination and a new upsurge in production and labour.
With this confidence, on behalf of the Party Central Committee, I wish the second T.U. Congress brilliant success.
46 47Some Problems of
Cadres and Organization in
Socialist Revolution
After the Party has worked out a correct political line, organizational work in general, and cadre work in particular, are decisive factors for success in the revolutionary tasks.
Problems of organization and cadres are particularly difficult and complicated in the conditions of our Party's holding power, when the Party's leadership encompasses all aspects of social life and activity.
In what follows, I shall be dealing chiefly with the problem of cadres, and, in relation to this problem, I shall be discussing only some of the most important aspects. With regard to organization, I shall mainly be discussing fundamental aspects related to the study and solution of the cadre problem.
The Building of a Contingent of Cadres
Must Proceed From the Political Line and Tasks
Cadre policy, if it is to be correct, must proceed fully from the requirements of the revolutionary tasks. The revolution needs a contingent of cadres who are equal to their political tasks, with regard to their number and quality as well as to their composition, a contingent of cadres capable of fulfilling to the highest degree the requirements of the political tasks in each period.
Complete loyalty to the ideals of socialism and communism, to the interests of the working class and the nation, to the political line
49of the Party; the severest sense of organization and discipline; close contacts with the masses; and the ability to fulfil the tasks assigned--- these are fundamental, unvarying requirements in the qualifications of cadres, in whatever period. Nevertheless, from the national democratic stage to the socialist stage, the revolution obviously undergoes basic changes in its character and tasks. That is why we cannot stop at general principles when tackling the problem of cadres.
In order to have a correct approach to the problem of cadres in the new stage, we must grasp the theory of socialist revolution in general, the theory of the Party in the conditions of its being in power, the theory of the State, of economic and social life, of the system of collective ownership by the working people, of the new socialist man, etc. We must not only fully grasp the theory of the line, guiding principles and policies, but also the theory of organization, one of the newest and most complicated areas in the building of socialism. Only in this way can we understand thoroughly and concretely the essence, content and requirements of the political tasks set in this stage, and hence examine and solve correctly the problem of cadres.
In the national democratic revolution, which was a long and arduous process comprising many stages and involving many forms of activity, sometimes underground, sometimes legal, sometimes armed struggle, sometimes political struggle, and often with a highly diverse combination of many forms of struggle at the same time, our Party trained batch after batch of cadres who lived up to President Ho Chi Minh's teaching: "Be true to the Party and loyal to the people, fulfil any task, overcome any difficulty, and defeat any enemy." That was possible because our Party was tempered in the national democratic revolution, firmly grasped the theory of the national people's democratic revolution, was armed with a wise revolutionary line and methods and had a thorough knowledge of the content and requirements of the political tasks in each period of the national democratic revolution.
In the socialist revolution, big achievements have been made in cadre policy, but in some spheres we have not done as well as required. Most worthy of mention here is the fact that there has not
always been full consistency of theory and practice, of principles and actual deeds. Our cadre work, from recruitment, training, appointment, fostering and promotion to appraisal and evaluation in many cases has not truthfully reflected our basic viewpoint that it is necessary to proceed from the requirements of the political tasks, a viewpoint that has been generally accepted. This is so because the tasks posed by the socialist revolution are something quite new to us, which we have not understood fully, clearly and concretely, either in theory or practice, so that we may have a given starting point when we have to examine and decide on questions of cadres.
To examine and solve questions of cadres is a problem closely associated with the political task. This requires that we base ourselves on the following viewpoint: there exists a very close, dialectical interrelation between cadres and the political line and tasks, between cadres and organization, between cadres and the revolutionary movement of the masses. A cadre's life is lived within the framework of this many-sided relationship. It is actually this relationship that makes a cadre a cadre. In this relationship, the cadre is at the same time cause and effect. Conversely, he is at the same time effect and cause.
1. Relationship Between Cadres and the Political Line and Tasks
A wise political line produces good cadres. Cadres are trained and mature under a wise line. On the other hand, they take part in the making and development of the line. They ensure the realization of the line. Without competent cadres, even though we have worked out a line, it will be useless. If cadres are bad, they will damage the line itself. If cadres are good and able, they not only help to carry out the line creatively but also contribute to its development.
The problem of cadres is posed under the premise that the line has been worked out. That is why a wise political line is the precondition for the existence of good cadres. It is quite impossible to have good cadres if the line is wrong. Of course, a wise line alone cannot exclude the possibility of wrongdoing and degradation on
51 50the part of cadres because whether a cadre acts rightly or wrongly, is good or bad, depends on many other factors than the line, including his personal attributes. However, a correct line is the basic condition in bringing the revolutionary tasks to success, and as such it produces one batch after another of good cadres and keeps to a minimum the possibility of cadres committing errors in political orientation. To be sure, in a revolutionary movement it is hardly possible to prevent a few bad, opportunist elements from infiltrating into the revolutionary ranks. However, if we have a strong mass movement arising from and developing along a correct line, and if the majority of our cadres stand firmly on this correct line, noxious tendencies not only have little chance of swaying our cadres but also are very likely themselves to be swept aside. But the picture will be quite different if errors are committed in the political line. A wrong line will take the cadres away from a correct direction, throw confusion into their ranks, and push numbers of them into wrongdoing. Of course, in such situations, there are always those who are alert enough to tell right from wrong and are able to defend the truth. But to bring the movement back on to the right path, the revolution must pay what is sometimes a very high price, including in terms of cadres, the most valuable asset of the revolution.
Thus, whether cadres are good or bad depends in the first place on the political line. However, as already stated, cadres in their turn exert a decisive influence on the line itself. Once a line has been worked out, the whole question boils down to how to organize its application. Organization is the basic measure to ensure the application of the line. Good or bad organization determines the success or failure of a line. Organization plays an especially big role in the conditions of socialist construction. However, in view of the content, character and scope of the work, we cannot oversimplify the matter by considering the whole question of organization and the work of organizing as a mere question of cadres. Organization has its own, independent role, a role of decisive importance for the cadres themselves. This matter will be further elaborated later on. Here we are discussing the relationship between the line and cadres. Cadres are the people who organize the fulfilment of the line. Thus
it is clear that cadres decide the success or failure of a line. By creatively and fruitfully organizing the application of the line, and bringing into play the abundant experience they have accumulated, cadres not only translate the line into reality but also positively contribute to the improvement, development and concretization of the line. And this is an extremely important, a prime requirement of any cadre. In the process of socialist industrialization, new problems will crop up one after another. A political line or a policy is not worked out once and for all, especially in the present conditions of our economy and our social life, when everything is growing and moving forward through rapid revolutionary changes. We witness at any given moment, every day and every hour, the emergence of new problems to which the Party must provide correct answers. Any cadre who does not grasp this reality, who is not sensitive to the new, who does not take pains to think, to make efforts to understand the realities, who lacks the ability to think independently and creatively in the process of applying the Party line and policies, is not a good cadre. Sooner or later he will be outstripped by life. Lenin said: "In our struggle we must remember that communists must be able to reason. They may be perfectly familiar with the revolutionary struggle and with the state of the revolutionary movement all over the world: but if we are to extricate ourselves from desperate poverty and want we need culture, integrity and an ability to reason"(l). In the building of a new society, in all spheres of our work, we must fully grasp the concrete problems and tasks posed by life and must decide on concrete solutions and successfully deal with these problems and tasks. To do so, we must exert our mental powers, must be cultured and find the proper methods.
Our Party has laid down the general line on socialist revolution and socialist construction. This general line must be concretized at each step of development, in each branch of activity, in each locality. Obviously, in every domain---industry, agriculture, circulation and distribution of goods, scientific and technological development, culture, education---many questions remain to be clarified. Some of these unclarified questions are actually affecting in a decisive way many aspects of our cadre work. For example, at a
52 53given moment, a certain branch of activity might not have decided on a clear direction of development. It has not fully grasped the reality and has not worked out a long-term plan for itself or, if it has, this plan is not yet based on sufficiently solid grounds, and its immediate goals are not yet defined very clearly. As a matter of course, this branch cannot have a firm basis for laying down an allround and correct plan for the training and fostering of cadres. Nor can the recruitment, appraisal and assignment of cadres have a correct direction.
Once we have defined the political line, orientation and objectives, it is organizational work and cadres that decide. However, saying that the cadres are the decisive factor amounts, in the final analysis, to saying that cadre policy and cadre work are the decisive factor. If cadre work is well done and if we have a correct cadre policy, we shall have an adequate contingent of good cadres. A correct cadre policy enables the creation and constant expansion of a contingent of cadres representing the Party's political life, who constantly ensure correct and full application of the tasks laid down by the Party and State, a contingent of cadres strong both collectively and individually; it provides conditions for cadres to give full play to their abilities and contributions, to advance constantly along with the constant development of the revolutionary tasks. This always leads to the most satisfactory results for the revolutionary cause.
There is a big leap forward from the struggle to seize power to being a Party in power. Without understanding the essence of this big leap forward, or the content, nature and unprecedented scope of the revolutionary tasks in the new stage, it is impossible to examine and correctly solve the problem of cadres. A Party in power means a Party leading the people in the management of the country's affairs. It means that Party leadership has been extended to the whole society, encompassing all aspects of life, which are more and more diversified and complicated. This requires that the Party and all its members and cadres---if they are to accomplish their mission as the vanguard---deeply understand and correctly apply the laws governing the development of society in general, as well as the laws of the emergence and development of socialist
society (this question is even more complicated and difficult in the case of a backward agricultural country directly advancing to socialism without going through the period of capitalist development). The Party and its members and cadres must have a thorough knowledge of all aspects of social activity, master all processes of social development, in order to direct every effort toward the ultimate goal of winning complete, final and thorough success for socialism in the historic struggle to settle the question "who will win?", socialism or capitalism, the socialist path or the capitalist path.
To assume the leadership, it is necessary to clearly understand, firmly grasp and command the extremely complex relations and interrelations between the various spheres: economy, politics, ideology and culture, between science, technology and production, between production and life, between immediate and long-range objectives, between subjective and objective factors in the process of development of society. The Party must organize all spheres of life in accordance with the principles of socialism and create a single, organic system which will enable it to utilize and mobilize all the material and spiritual potential of society with a view to developing economy and culture, and improving the material and moral life of the people at the fastest possible rate.
All these activities actually make up the process of the simultaneous prosecution, on the basis of proletarian dictatorship, of the three revolutions---the revolution in production relations, the technical revolution and the ideological and cultural revolution---aimed at transforming social life from top to bottom. Obviously, these are completely new tasks.
Advancing directly to socialism without going through the period of capitalist development is a road of which experience is still rare in the world. This experience remains to be summed up. Moreover, we must take into full account the characteristics and specific conditions of our country. This requires big efforts from the Party in research and creation on the theoretical plane and the working out, on that basis, of a concrete, really effective programme for social life in order to fight for the triumph of socialism. It requires from our Party, from its members and cadres, high
54 55capacity in practical organization based on a profound understanding of all aspects of life and social activity of which in many spheres we have very scanty knowledge or were even completely ignorant until recently. Without such a capacity, it is impossible to assume the leadership and to carry out the great socialist tasks. All this is particularly difficult and complicated since the problem is not simply to do away with an old society that has existed for thousands of years but also to build a completely new life that will ensure full development of society as well as of each person.
It is upon these considerations that we must base our thinking concerning the problem of cadres in the socialist revolution. Rather than being an abstract and isolated question, or purely a question of individuals, the problem of cadres must first of all be seen as a question of the Party, a question of accomplishing the tasks of leadership of the Party in the new stage of history, in the face of new tasks.
To link the problem of cadres with the requirements of the revolutionary tasks is, in more concrete terms, to proceed from the political line of the Party. The general line of the Party in the socialist revolution consists in firmly grasping proletarian dictatorship, simultaneously carrying out the three revolutions of which the technical revolution is the centrepiece, carrying out socialist industrialization with the aim of building large-scale, socialist production, giving priority and rational development to heavy industry on the basis of developing agriculture and light industry, building centrally run industry while developing regional economies, and in combining economic management with national defence. The whole Party line, from the general line to the concrete policies in each sphere of activity, is directed at the fundamental objective of the period of transition, viz. winning definitive victory for socialism in the struggle to determine "who will win?", the socialist path or the capitalist path, in North Viet Nam.
We must proceed from this political line in considering and solving the question of cadres.
This means that the whole of our cadre work and our policy concerning cadres must ensure the successful application of this general line in social life.
This means that it is necessary to have a contingent of cadres capable of ensuring the realization of this political line, who are completely loyal to it, who understand it deeply and are resolved to struggle for its successful realization and for the realization of all the tasks laid down by the Party, and to do this on a principled basis, with the highest determination, with all necessary knowledge and with ability to apply the Party line in a creative manner.
This means that all aspects of our cadre work and cadre policy, from recruitment, training and utilization to appraisal and promotion etc. of cadres must rest on this foundation and take it as the primary criterion.
This means that we must examine the question of cadres in a concrete manner and cannot content ourselves with generalities about morality or class stand.
2. Class Stand and Revolutionary Qualities
In the Marxist-Leninist view, the inevitable success of socialism does not stem from the natural disposition of man or from some moral principles, but from objective laws of development of society. The Party line is actually the reflection and application of the laws which have been enunciated in the Marxist-Leninist doctrine. The socialism we are building can be achieved only on the basis of these laws, on the principles of Marxism-Leninism. That is our class stand, the foundation of our concept of morality.
Our class stand and the whole of our morality consist in struggling with self-denial for national independence, for the welfare and happiness of our people, for socialism and communism. In the past, this stand and morality consisted in struggling to overthrow the domination of imperialism and the reactionary puppet forces and wresting back power for the people. At present, this stand and morality in North Viet Nam is the stand of the working class as master of the State and master of society. This morality is one of collective masters who are struggling to do away with poverty, backwardness, ignorance and disease, create a modern industry, a modern agriculture, and advanced culture and science to ensure continual improvement in the people's material and cultural life,
56 57and the building of an independent, free, prosperous and strong socialist fatherland.
All lines and policies of our Party are aimed at this objective. That is why our class stand, our morality, actually consists in struggling for the successful realization of the line and policies as well as all tasks laid down by the Party.
As disciples of Marxism-Leninism, the doctrine that advocates reforming the world society and man through revolution in conformity with the laws of historical evolution, we do not talk of morality for morality's sake or in any other sense.
Class stand must also be understood correctly, in a scientific sense. By class we do not mean the aggregation of separate individuals but a social group holding a definite position in the system of social production. What is more, the proletariat fully took shape as a class only after it had changed from a class "of its own" into a class "for its own", that is, after it acquired class consciousness. This consciousness is not the simple sum total of individual consciousness but the consciousness of the historic position and mission of the whole class. Class stand, therefore, is the political stand of the class. It is consciousness of the overall, fundamental and long-term interests of the class and a firm determination to defend these interests. With regard to the working class, if it is to realize its historic position and mission, it must be armed with Marxism-Leninism. Marxism-Leninism is the theoretical representation of the workers' movement. It correctly reflects the objective laws of the development of society. It is the ideology of the working class and the genuine and scientific embodiment of the class stand of the working class. In combination with the workers' movement, Marxism-Leninism forms the political Party of the proletariat. The Party is the expression of the class consciousness and class stand of the working class at its highest, most comprehensive and most mature level. Only with a Party armed with the vanguard theory of Marxism-Leninism can the working class become the vanguard class at the helm of the revolution. And only then can the class stand of the working class really take shape. Without knowledge of Marxism-Leninism, of revolutionary science and of the vanguard theory of the proletariat, there can be no class
stand of the vanguard class.
Thus, the stand of the working class is the stand of Marxism-Leninism of which the Party, its political line and activities, are concrete and practical manifestations. That is why, for a militant of the Party, to struggle with self-abnegation, without fear of sacrifices, to struggle courageously, staunchly, indomitably and untiringly for the successful realization of the Party's political line, is actually the stand of the working class. This is the foundation of our morality. To talk of class stand, of morality, without proceeding from this foundation, is, in effect, to replace Marxism-Leninism and the Party's political line with feudal concepts of morality or with a sort of sentimental petty-bourgeois socialism completely alien to the genuine stand of the working class and genuine proletarian morality. All manifestations of deviation from Marxism-Leninism and the Party political line are contrary to the working-class stand. To struggle uncompromisingly against these manifestations is to embody the stand of the working class. We do not recognize any other criterion as far as stand is concerned.
So, class stand is not only a question of sentiment and aspirations but also a question of intellectual acquirements. It is Marxist-Leninist scientific theory. Only on this basis can the most ardent revolutionary aspirations become realizable. Nor does class stand consist simply of scientific theory. It also embraces the political science built on the basis of that theory. What is more, class stand is not only the political line but also practical revolutionary activities and correct revolutionary methods aimed at successfully carrying out that political line in real life.
Class stand should not be understood in an intuitive and spontaneous way. The workers themselves, if their movement grows out of sheer spontaneity, cannot have a working-class stand. They can, at best, achieve trade union consciousness and trade unionism---which stops at economic interests of an immediate, partial and professional character. Trade unionism is, in Lenin's words, "the ideological enslavement of the workers by the bourgeoisie."(2)
On the other hand, we must grasp class stand from a concrete,
58 59historical point of view. Class stand when the working class has seized power and become the masters of society is different from what it was when the working class had not yet seized power and was still in the position of wage earners. With regard to the concrete content of class stand, a completely new, qualitative development has occurred, embodying the greatest leap forward in human history. If, in the past, the task of the working class was to overthrow the yoke of oppression and exploitation---that is, a task of a destructive character---today its task is to build and create a new society which not only abolishes oppression and exploitation but also creates all necessary conditions for bringing the fullest possible material and moral life to the whole of the working class. In order to build such a society, it is necessary not only to possess a full sense of being the collective master, but also to have the methods and the ability to master society, master nature and master our own personality. This is the basic content of the class stand of the working class. This is also the highest moral requirement of the socialist system.
The Party, the vanguard and the best organized contingent, the highest organization of the working class, is the conscious representative of the stand of the working class conceived as collective master. It leads the entire society to put into effect the great historical law of replacing the age-old system of private ownership (from which oppression and exploitation originate) by socialist collective ownership. If the workers cannot spontaneously acquire the revolutionary stand of the proletariat, still less can the peasants, whether they be poor, landless or lower-middle peasants. In comparison with the advance of the peasant from the status of a toiler exploited by landlords to that of a free private farmer, the change from being a private farmer to a collective farmer represents a much more significant leap forward. Obviously, from the viewpoint of historical development, compared with the individual, private farmer, the co-operative farmer is closer to the position of the working class. This represents precisely a new step forward of the worker-peasant alliance in the stage of socialist construction, definitely higher in quality than the previous stage. But the co-operative farmer is still not a worker. On the ideologi-
cal plane, only the most vanguard representatives of the collective farmer class, the most outstanding co-operative farmers, come close to the stand of the working class. And this can only be the outcome of a process of training and education through the practice of revolution, through collective work in production and through a process of ideological persuasion which thoroughly imbues them with the Party line and policies and makes them fully conscious of the role and tasks of the collective farmer class in the cause of socialist construction, imbued with the working class' sense of collective ownership.
So far, in dealing with the quality of Party members and cadres, we have often failed to make sufficiently clear and to hit right home at the most essential and most necessary points. We have often used abstractions and generalities when speaking of class stand and morality, while remaining unclear or failing to put emphasis on the most important requirements, the most decisive points and criteria which are so essential for a communist, a Party cadre, that without them they hardly deserve the name. It is necessary to point out here that the Party Constitution has adequately and strictly defined all criteria and fundamental requirements for a Party member. All requirements of a Party member in matters of class stand and morality are also clearly stated in the Party Constitution. When we speak of Party cadres, this implies all members of the Party, because every Party member has the duty to exercise Party leadership in his field of work, and, in this sense, a Party member is by definition a cadre. All criteria, requirements and tasks defined in the Party Constitution for each Party member represent the basic and highest principles of a communist's class stand and morality. The problem is that the admission of a new Party member must necessarily meet the criteria provided for in the Party Constitution. Secondly, within the Party, we must constantly base ourselves on the criteria, requirements and tasks of a Party member as defined in the Constitution to educate Party cadres and members and to check up on cadres (here we are referring exclusively to Party cadres) and Party members. Of course, there should be modifications to the Party Constitution in the light of the political tasks in each given period. However, in no period may the Party allow activities that
60 61fall outside the provisions of the Constitution. That is why it would be not only nonsense but also plain rejection of the Constitution, if we conceived of the class stand and morality of Party members as anything other than what is stated in the provisions of the Party Constitution.
When looking for strong points as well as weaknesses and defects in the quality of a Party member or cadre, we must first of all examine his level of study and assimilation of Marxism-Leninism, his knowledge and understanding of the Party line and policies, his determination to make efforts and his practical ability to implement this line and these policies as well as his ability to fulfil the tasks assigned and to persuade and organize the masses to join him in implementing the line, policies and all tasks laid down by the Party. In the end, all this must be translated into practical deeds and the extent of the benefits brought to the revolution by these deeds. Certainly we should not base ourselves solely on momentary or inconsequential actions, but must carefully examine a long process, with all the tested evidence. This process is nothing other than the process of implementing the tasks entrusted by the revolution. That is why, whether he fulfils his tasks or not always remains the only trustworthy, objective yardstick in measuring the qualifications of a Party member or cadre, and in making necessary decisions in the various fields of cadre work and policy. In the final analysis, the qualities and abilities of a Party member or cadre, to what degree he is "Red and expert", his class stand and so on, must be judged on that basis. For instance, along with the revolution in production relations, and the ideological and cultural revolution, we must carry out the technical revolution and consider this as the centrepiece. We must build the material and technical foundations of socialism. Thus, the question arises: where does the quality of a Party cadre lie in the building of the material and technical revolution? It lies in his ability to understand the line of socialist industrialization, the line of technical revolution, in the high or low level of his determination to implement these lines, in his ability to accomplish the concrete tasks assigned to him as shown in the practical results he has achieved. Obviously, here the firmest class stand and the highest morality of a cadre consists in making the boldest assault
on the technical and scientific battleground, in striving to advance in order to attain a high level of culture and knowledge and in mastering by all means the essence of the necessary techniques and sciences. And all this must be done with the full awareness that otherwise there can be no socialism, there can be no victory of the socialist path over the capitalist path, for, "according to the materialistic conception, the determining factor in history, in the last resort, is the production and reproduction of immediate life". (3) Such are class stand and revolutionary quality in this case.
Organization and Cadres
I. Relationship between cadres and organization
We have discussed the relationship between cadres and the political line and tasks. The problem of cadres must also be examined in the context of the close relationship between cadres and organization. By organization we mean not only the organization of the Party, but also of the State, economic and cultural organizations, mass organizations, military organizations, and organizations in all spheres of social life and activity. Organization, in the broadest sense, is the structure for the existence of things and phenomena. Things and phenomena cannot exist without a definite form of combination of the various factors making them up. Organization, therefore, is an attribute of things and phenomena themselves. When we speak of organization in our social life, we are dealing with the relationship and the coordination of the activity of the various parts of a whole, the system of leadership and management in all fields and in all branches, the system of forms and measures for the realization of the decisions from the moment the plans are worked out to the final stage of checking on the results achieved.
We cannot conceive of a cadre outside the organization because the cadre is an element of the organization. The cadre lives in a definite organization, in the apparatus whereby an organization operates. Organization is formed by man. Man is the main component factor of an organization. An organization cannot operate without man. A product of man, an organization cannot
62 63but depend on man, on his qualities and capacities of action. On the other hand, after organization has become a quantity existing in its own right and has struck deep roots in life, organization in its turn has a decisive effect on man. It determines who will do what, what position and function he should hold in the apparatus of activity. It defines beforehand the direction and objective of man's actions. It directs man and obliges him to act one way instead of another. Organization, in its activity, brings forth in man definite characteristics and qualities. It trains man. The capacities and effectiveness of man's activity depend on organization. Organization increases man's strength manyfold. Organization creates a new quality. Marx wrote: "Just as the combat strength of a cavalry unit or the resistance of an infantry battalion differs in substance from the sum total of the individual strength of each cavalryman or each separate combatant, the sum total of the mechanical strength of each separate worker also differs from the mechanical strength created when they work in co-ordination and at the same time in the same indivisible work .... The problem is not only to increase individual productivity, but also to use cooperative methods to create a new production force that operates as a single, collective force."(4)
All this is directly related to the examination and resolution of the problem of cadres. For instance, in looking for the strong points and weaknesses of Party cadres and members, if we confine ourselves to examining their ideological qualities and assessing their ideological standard separately from the question of organization, if we fail to see the influence and impact of organization on cadres, then we are overlooking one main ground for the correct examination and resolution of the cadre problem.
A strong Party branch and a strong Party executive committee give rise to strong Party members and cadres. Wherever the Party branch and committee are rickety, the Party members and cadres find their fighting strength reduced and are prone to degeneration and backsliding. Of course, the reverse in this case is completely true, because in their relations with the organization, Party cadres and members are at the same time the effect and the cause. However, even if this or that individual is the cause of the shakiness
of the organization, the question still remains essentially a question of organization. Because those individuals who are members of the organization, but have thought and acted contrary to its requirements, have done so because the organization either lacks the necessary guarantees in criteria or the necessary rules for activity and behaviour or is not strong enough to compel the individuals concerned to comply with the norms, rules and decisions of the organization. That is why, in any case, we must proceed from organization to examine and resolve the question. We must realize that the question of individuals here is essentially a question of organization and must base our criticism of the ideology of these individuals on the organization; we must base ourselves on the requirements of the organization, on the criteria and principles of the organization and on the ideology itself that is required by the organization when we have to determine the responsibility of individuals. That is the principled method of work.
Take the example of the question of internal unity and solidarity among cadres. It is regrettable that lack of solidarity has occurred in a number of places. There are complex causes behind this phenomenon but we must point out at once that if some of these cases have dragged on and become more and more complicated without any definite conclusion being arrived at as to where lie right and wrong, and who is right, who is wrong, it is because we have not examined and resolved the question on a principled basis. In fact, in all such cases, the question will become clear and can be settled rapidly if it is posed on the principle of closely linking ideology and policies with the organization, the principle of comparing the thoughts and actions of the persons concerned with the requirements of the organization. As far as the Party is concerned, the basis for unity within the Party can be nothing other than the Marxist-Leninist outlook on the world, the political line and resolutions of the Party and the Party Constitution---the fundamental law for all Party life, for the building of the Party and all Party activity. The Party forms a single ideological entity. This means that the Party is a monolithic bloc not only in ideology but also in organization, which is a guarantee for its unity of action. If the question of solidarity and the resolution of cases of disunity is
64 65not based on these foundations and principles of Party organization, and is based instead on considerations of personal relations, there can be no real solidarity. If unity is broken, it is hardly possible to avoid permanent discord and one problem will engender another, paralysing the whole organization, and, as a consequence, each member of the organization will also lose fighting strength.
Man's strength lies in his organization. Only within and through organization and through relationships with other persons and realities can a man show what he is and what he is capable of. Of course, we cannot conceive man as part of a machine. Man is an entity endowed with conscience, will, dynamism and initiative, and each man has his own character and capabilities. That is why it cannot be said that an organization has no room for the role of the individual. If each person is a cipher, the organization itself cannot exist because an organization is actually the combination of many persons. In fact, how can there be the "collective capacity" (Marx) of the organization without the effectiveness of each person? Obviously, there must be strong people if the organization is to be strong, and there must be good people if the organization is to be good. On the other hand, this fundamental point must be made clear: the strength of a person lies in organization and organization creates a new strength which differs completely in quality from the sum of the strength of separate persons. The dialectic in this case consists in the following: a strong organization ensures the strength of each person and the strength of each person makes the strength of the organization.
To do cadre work is to place a cadre in his right place and promote him at the right time, and place him in the most appropriate conditions of organization which will enable him to give full play to his talents and creativity as required by the revolutionary tasks. And this is actually to increase the strength of organization because the strength of organization makes itself felt through the active and creative work of each person and constitutes a collective, organized force.
In an organization where functions and tasks are not clear, where the distribution of work is irrational, where norms of work and the
allocation of responsibility are not well defined, where the relationship and cohesion among the various component parts or their homogeneity are lacking, any person in it will tend to become impotent and inefficient because it is a weak organization. An individual, detached from his organization, is capable of nothing. In an organization which is an organic whole, the strong points of each person will be multiplied while his weak points will be limited and overcome and each person will think and act with all the moral and physical strength of the organization. Organization helps "eliminate the limitations springing from individuals and develop their collective capacities".(5) If the whole body is strong, every organ and every cell will also be strong and vice versa.
That is why we cannot speak of cadres separately from organization. In fact, we are already dealing with organization when speaking of cadres. We must deal with and resolve the question of cadres on the basis of organization, by proceeding from the character, function, task, structure of organization and the requirements for its activity. A correct solution to the question of organization is the basis for solving the question of cadres correctly. A judicious political line must be ensured by correct organization, and correct organization is precisely the premise directly deciding a correct solution to the question of cadres. Take the economy for example. If we succeed in building a system of management which really corresponds to the laws governing economic development and to the principles of production, which eliminates methods of management of an administrative character in which money and materials are simply supplied to departments without proper costing, this will be a condition of prime importance in compelling cadres to take into consideration the economic efficiency of production and to make a deep examination of the production structure and process, thereby enhancing their sense of responsibility, their consciousness of being the collective master, and their level and capacity of management. That will be a condition of prime importance in combating bureaucratic practices and the method of casual handling of affairs which exhibits no concern as to whether the plan is fulfilled or not and whether the factory is making profits or is operating at a loss.
66 67,
Unless organizational work is well done, unless we understand and firmly control an organization, we cannot perform cadre work well. Cadre work is closely linked with organizational work. On the other hand, we should know how to run and control an organization not only with regard to its structure, apparatus, personnel and means, but also deeply understand and firmly grasp its function, task, line, objective and method of work. Only in this way can cadre work be carried out well. In principle, to assume the leadership means to control the organization and he who controls and directs the organization has the decisive voice in questions concerning cadres because he, better than anybody else, understands the cadres and the needs in cadres within the sphere of his responsibility. (Of course, we must comply with concrete regulations in procedural questions concerning proposals and ratifications.)
2. Cadre Work is the First and
Foremost Task in Organizational Work
Cadre work is, in its essence, organizational work and it is precisely because of the need for organization, and in view of the necessity to ensure the highest efficiency of leadership and management that we must do cadre work well, considering it as the first and foremost task of organizational work. Lenin said: "We shall go our way and try as carefully and as patiently as possible to test and discover real organizers, people with sober and practical minds, people who combine loyalty to socialism with ability without fuss (and in spite of muddle and fuss) to get a large number of people working together steadily and correctly within the framework of the Soviet organization. Only such people, after they have been tested a dozen times, by being transferred from the simplest to the more difficult tasks, should be promoted to the responsible posts of leaders of the people's labour, leaders of administration. We have not yet learned to do this, but we shall learn."(6)
Cadre work must be done in meticulous, careful and thorough manner, because men, cadres, are the soul and the motive force of organization. How many cadres and what kinds of cadres are needed for such and such an organization with such and such tasks?
That is the starting point for reaching judicious decisions on cadres. So far, in many cases, we have not acted exactly in this way. Often we make overstatements or understatements, we make inordinate inferences or omissions when assessing a cadre. We use generalities to assess the qualities and capabilities of a cadre and finish up by taking in a man who cannot do the job. In some instances, we do not even proceed from the job and organization to place men, but instead create jobs and organizations out of the need to place men. Such humps are still on our backs.
Only by proceeding from organization to place men can we fully realize the necessity to understand men thoroughly and accurately and set forth the necessary criteria for such men. A Party secretary, a director, a specialist, a production brigade leader, etc., each of these functions represents a definite organization. It is a definite function of a definite organization. We must base ourselves on the concrete requirement of each organization, each function, to lay down concrete criteria for cadres and proceed to recruit cadres and put them in the right places and also to inquire into these cadres and correctly appraise them. Any organization requires that its cadres have a full sense of personal responsibility and make the highest efforts. These requirements must be defined in a concrete manner: what and how many jobs they have to do, what they must know, what regulations they must comply with, whom they are responsible to, what are their responsibilities and power, how they are related to other cadres and organizations, who has the right to appoint and dismiss them, etc. It is through the practical application of these regulations that we will supervise and inquire into a cadre, understand his capabilities, his qualities and morality. Lenin said: "To test men and verify what has actually been done---this, this again, this alone is now the main feature of all our activities, of our whole policy."(7)
That is the correct way to understand the work of cadre control. We should not control a man separately from the work that the organization requires from him. Control work, in this sense, is a link of prime importance in organizational work.
69 683. Collective Method of Work and Individual Responsibility
Each cadre holds a definite position of work in his organization, in the leading and managerial apparatus. Whether each cadre fulfils his responsibility or not naturally influences the common activity of the whole organization, the whole apparatus. If he does his work well, the effectiveness and strength of the whole organization will increase accordingly. Conversely, if he works poorly, the effectiveness and strength of the whole organization suffers. Here, we must point out that the role- of those who head an organization, the leaders, is very great and has a decisive character. That is why they must meet very high requirements. The leaders must embody loyalty and dedication in the implementation of the line and policies of the Party and State and must have the necessary capabilities and determination to bring the line and policies into effect. They must have rich experience, foresight and aliveness to the new, a creative, imaginative mind to combine collective leadership with the ability to make clearsighted decisions on the basis of a deep knowledge of the tasks assigned and a firm grasp of the situation. With high determination to achieve the set objective, leaders must have the capability to organize and mobilize their collaborators and the masses to follow suit. They must show a high sense of responsibility, great determination and a principled attitude in handling affairs. They must take into account and really respect the opinion of others, and calmly listen to the suggestions of the masses even if they do not agree with them. They must have a generous attitude toward others, and a high sense of self-criticism, must dare to admit their errors and mistakes and have the determination to correct them. These are indispensable qualities in leaders. If they possess these qualities, leaders will enjoy the necessary prestige and trust without which they cannot lead.
The capability and effectiveness of the leadership directly depend on whether or not the leaders can build a united and like-minded collective around themselves. In this collective, each cadre must have a profound sense of being the collective master, a high sense of responsibility toward the common cause, and place common interests first. While putting all his mind and energies in service of
I
the common success of the collective organization and clearly realizing his function and role in the common cause, each cadre must accomplish his personal responsibility assigned by the organization with his greatest efforts and with self-imposed discipline. Concern for the common objective, the common interest, the common cause, must be manifested first of all in the full execution of his personal responsibility. Whether this personal responsibility is accomplished or not is the first criterion in appraising the contribution of each to the common cause. At the same time, each must closely co-operate with others in the working collective. An organization, by definition, is a collective, a working collective in which every member needs the others, the one working with and for the others with the aim of achieving a cause which transcends the capabilities of each separate individual. Co-operation therefore is essential.
Co-operation is effected first of all through the accomplishment by each member of his personal responsibility because the non-accomplishment of the task of one person immediately affects the accomplishment of the tasks of others. In an organization, if every member needs the co-operation of others, it is because of the organic interrelation among the various parts of the work as parts of one and the same whole. Distribution of work implies in itself co-operation, and inversely co-operation implies a distribution of work. The question is to understand this relationship and to put it fully into practice in our work. While accomplishing his task, each must show concern for the others and help them accomplish their tasks. Bound together by a common objective---in the broadest sense, the objective of the entire society and, in the narrower sense, the objective of the organization in which they work---everybody in the collective should be animated by mutual affection, without which there can be no co-operation and joint efforts in the struggle for the triumph of the common cause. We must rejoice at the successes of our comrades as at our own and concern ourselves with the difficulties of our comrades as with our own. We must rejoice at the progress of our friends and comrades as at our own; and we should never be motivated by personal ambition and calculations of rivalry and jealousy. Those are decisive factors for
70 71building a really intimate and united collective. And such an intimate and united collective is actually the strength of the organization. With such a strength, no task is unrealizable and no difficulty insurmountable. Struggle and mutual love are the raison d'etre of man and, in the first place, of revolutionary cadres.
4. Our Strength Lies in our Organization
We cannot speak of cadres without speaking of organization. However, organization is an extremely complex question. Organizing in the most effective way requires a whole science, the science of organization. We cannot organize in any way we fancy. Organization has its own laws. An organization is created to ensure the realization of the political line and tasks. Accordingly, any organization must conform with the political line and respond to the requirements of the realization of the political tasks. Any organization must also suit the objects to be organized and the areas in which the organization wants to exert its influence. Different spheres of activity require different forms of organization. For instance, in productive activity, the objects of organization are the working people and the means and objects of labour, whereas in fighting, the objects of organization are the combatants, weapons and armaments, and the objective is to defeat an organized and armed enemy engaged in a life-and-death struggle with us. Each sphere of activity has its specific laws. Obviously, economic laws differ from the laws of war. Accordingly, the organization and methods of organization in different spheres of activity cannot but differ among themselves. The forms of organization also vary with the period, depending on the level and extent of development of the objects of organization. Things and social and economic processes are developing unceasingly and the role of organization consists in vigorously promoting this development. Therefore, organization must be very dynamic and flexible at the same time. An organization can give full scope to its strength only when it fully corresponds with its objects and the laws of development of its objects. When it does not, organization may seriously hamper the development of its objects. An organization may be either highly revolutionary or highly conservative. It is
most revolutionary when it fully corresponds with the needs of life. It is most conservative when it develops a tendency to inertia while life is constantly changing and moving forward. The big industrial organization has a highly revolutionary character whereas the handicraft organization has a highly conservative character.
At present, our organization in many spheres still belongs to the second category. We may say that in some areas our organization is not only backward but also obsolete. That is the cause of our inertia. Obviously, in such cases, there must be a whole revolution in organization from the structure of the apparatus, the mode of activity, the internal relations and the style of work, to the disposition of cadres. There have been suggestions in some quarters that it is time to resolutely and boldly replace a number of cadres who not only fall short in their tasks but are also seriously hampering the functioning of the whole machine. This is absolutely necessary. We need to replace them with cadres with a flair for organization who are not only loyal and dedicated but also capable of grasping and creatively applying the line, policies and tasks laid down by the Party and the State, and capable of getting the whole machine moving. However, in any case, we should always bear in mind that in the final analysis and from a basic and overall point of view, our strength lies in organization, and all the effectiveness of our activity stems from organization. In a broader sense, the steadiness and unshakable strength of our regime as a whole are not due to one or two persons of special talent but to our organization, to the whole politico-economic and social structure based on the principles of socialism which we must build at all costs.
This, evidently, is an extremely complicated and difficult task since we are advancing from a backward agricultural society, a system of small production. Everything has to be created virtually from scratch; modern industry, modern agriculture, advanced culture and science. Everything has to be built up: a new system, a new economy and a new man. But in what way and in what forms, with what measures and through what processes to reach our objective in the shortest possible period, and to make up for the lag caused by centuries of inertia? That is the sum total of the difficulties we face in our organizational work.
72 73It is made all the more difficult by our lack of capacity in practical organizational work, a serious shortcoming left over from history. It must also be pointed out here that the difficulty stems first of all from our failure to see the importance of organization. Organization makes strength. Yet, we have not seen the strength of organization. The small producer, the handicraftsman, cannot see the strength of organization because the conditions of their productive activity and their livelihood are inherently conditions of non-organization and constantly bring about states of non-- organization. Only workers in large-scale industry can see the strength of organization because the strength of organization actually derives from large-scale industry. The centuries-old influence of Confucianism also prevents us from seeing the strength of organization. Confucianism has left in us the vestiges of a kind of egoistic, individualistic morality, an ugly product of the feudalist system of ownership and the caste system. Everything in this "moral code" is completely contrary to our revolutionary outlook on life, to the needs of our great organizational work aimed at building socialism. Only Marxism-Leninism, the revolutionary science of the proletariat, the class whose strength lies in its organization, can see the strength of organization, the strength of the organized working class and working people.
We should ponder over and draw the necessary lessons from the following words of Lenin: "Give us an organization of revolutionaries, and we will overturn Russia."(8) He also said: "In its struggle for power, the proletariat has no other weapon but organization."(9) Once, Lenin put it in an even more imperative way, stressing that the whole task is to "organize, organize and organize."(10) After power has passed into the hands of the revolution, Lenin pointed out that "the most important and most difficult aspect of the socialist revolution is the tasks of organization."(11)
5. It is Necessary to Make Ideology and Organization into One
We should get rid of our inveterate habit of talking of ideology alone (and in many cases we do not understand correctly what ideology actually means) and seldom speaking of organization. To
carry out revolution we must have a revolutionary ideology and also a revolutionary organization. Organization ensures the realization of ideology. Organization ensures that words are matched by deeds. If we speak of ideology without speaking of organization, that is mere empty theorising and empty morality without any practical effect. That is the inherent defect of pettybourgeois intellectuals and Confucian scholars. Practising means organizing. If we want to practise anything, we must have an organization and must make ideology one with organization. It is actually out of the needs of action, of the needs of revolutionary practice, that we must have a revolutionary ideology. No revolutionary movement can take place without being prepared and promoted by ideological campaigns. The deeper the revolutionary changes we want to effect, the deeper and more extensive the ideological campaigns we must undertake. Without revolutionary theory and revolutionary ideology, there can be no revolutionary actions. However, theory and ideology alone are absolutely insufficient. As Karl Marx pointed out, "Ideology is essentially incapable of achieving anything. If an ideology is to be materialized there must be men using practical forces." In other words, if an ideology is to be put into practice, there must be organization. Men must be organized with definite means and act strictly in accordance with this ideology. The question of cadres is posed in the light of the need to carry out the line and policies of the Party, the needs of revolutionary practice. That is why, when we speak of cadres we already mean organization. Only with a very practical mind, a sense of realism, and a revolutionary will can we see the importance of organization and the strength of organization, hence the importance of the problem of cadres, what is required from cadres, in terms of ideology, ardour, will and energy, capacity and creativeness.
6. Building a System of Correct Relations Between the Party, the State and the Masses
Our foremost task in the field of organizational activity is to create, on a nation-wide scale as well as in every locality, every branch and every grassroots unit, all the way up to the highest level
74 75and down again, a system of correct relations between the Party, the State and the masses. These relations must reflect the essence of the new regime and must be employed as the biggest and most powerful combined force for the vigorous promotion of the process of creating a socialist system in all spheres of the economy and culture, and building and developing social relations in all fields, and relations between man and man. Such a correct system of relations will ensure in the firmest way the all-round and absolute leadership of the Party over social life and the development of society, ensure the highest capacity and the greatest effectiveness of the role of the State as the organ of economic and cultural management, ensure to the highest degree the genuine right of the people of being collective masters and the most success for the efforts of the masses in the creation of history.
The question of cadres is posed on this basis, within the framework and in the light of the needs of that system of relations. The Party could not lead society and the people to build socialism without the State and without the medium of the State. The working people cannot become masters of society and successfully prosecute their cause without the leadership of the Party---the representative of the most correct thinking and line of collective mastery in conformity with the laws of development of society. The people play their role as masters of society under the leadership of the Party and through the medium of the State which was founded and is managed by the people themselves. The leadership of the Party and the rights of the people as collective masters of society find a concentrated expression in the State and State activity---all this can only be realized through the medium of the State. The State would cease to be a proletarian State if it did not reflect the power of the working people and if its activity were not based on the Marxist-Leninist line of the political Party of the working class.
As the political Party leading the State, it goes without saying that the Party organization, the apparatus of the Party and most of the Party members and cadres must be assigned to and strike deep roots in all spheres of activity of the State and society, without exception. The life of the Party essentially resides in the entire activity of the State, over the whole range of political, military,
economic, cultural and social activity. The Party is the nucleus lying at the heart of social life which sets in motion the whole apparatus of the regime, and drives the entire society forward.
We can thus see how many more cadres of all kinds are needed and how much is required of cadres. There are so many new areas where cadres must be active and establish themselves as capable, competent masters: industry, agriculture, trade, culture, science, education, military work, law, etc. This we must realize because otherwise we cannot understand the lines and policies of the Party, contribute to the working out and development of these lines and policies, or organize their achievement---in a word, we cannot exercise Party leadership.
On the other hand, by leadership we mean that the Party exercises its leadership through the State and by means of the State, It is necessary to transform the line, policies and resolutions of the Party into policies and activities of the State. The State is the highest, broadest and most concentrated organization for the exercise of the right of the people as the collective masters of society. The Party exercises its leadership over the State. It does not replace the State in ruling. We have the dictatorship of the proletarian State, not the dictatorship of the Party. The proletarian State is essentially the exercise of the working people's right as collective masters of society under the leadership of the working class and through the Marxist-Leninist political Party. The Party's exercise of its leadership of the State means that all lines and policies of the Party must be transformed into policies, plans and resolutions of the State and must be reflected and carried out in a State form and by the organizational means and forms of State activity. They must be transformed into State affairs. And this is not simple. "With the transition of all power---this time not only political and, not even mainly political, but economic power, that is, power that affects the deepest foundations of everyday human existence---to a new class, and, moreover, to a class which for the first time in the history of humanity is the leader of the overwhelming majority of the population, of the whole mass of the working and exploited people---our tasks become more complicated."(12)
The apparatus of the proletarian State is not only a ruling
76 77machine. It is also an organ of economic management, a machine for running social production on the basis of a correct reflection of socialist economic laws and appropriate solutions to the objective requirements of production. It is precisely from this starting point that we should determine the structure, scale, tasks, power and mode of activity of the State organs for economic leadership (such as the Ministry of Industry, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Trade, etc.). This we have not clearly realized and strictly observed, hence the bureaucratic and purely administrative forms of handling affairs in organizational work and in the mode of activity of many State organs having responsibility for economic leadership.
As an organ of economic management and a production machine, the State is central to economic activity, functioning as the owner of the main means of production and a producer who organizes and directs social production. On the basis of a firm knowledge of objective economic laws and the principles of socialist economy, we must learn to manage according to State methods and must conform with the regulations and norms of the State in economic management as well as in the management of society in general. The State is law. We must manage society and economy by means of State laws. Only through the State, the systems, regulations and norms of the State, through the system of economic laws and the whole system of State laws can the line, policies and tasks worked out by the Party penetrate into social life and become a reality. Formerly the Party line and policies penetrated the masses and were implemented through propaganda and agitation work with regard to each person or each group. Today, besides these methods which we must apply even more effectively, broadly and adequately, we must also use large-scale organizational measures involving millions and tens of millions of citizens. This can be done only through State laws which reflect the interests and will of the working people. The whole system of State legislation and economic legislaton represents the line and policies of the Party and also the interests and will of the labouring people manifested in the form of the State. They are powerful and very effective organizational instruments of the State in carrying out the
I
line, policies and tasks worked out by the Party on the basis of a powerful dictatorship of the proletariat. Yet, our cadres are for the most part still ignorant of this truth or have not yet acquainted themselves with it. Some even look upon these laws as a burden or an obstacle. They try by all means to free themselves from the burden of them. And what is the result? Autocratism and arbitrariness on the one hand and anarchy on the other. In general, this is an attitude of defiance of State laws. This also means that they have infringed upon the rights of the people as collective masters and upon Party leadership which find their concentrated expression in the State. To avoid this state of affairs, ideological education alone is not enough. We must also strengthen State laws and perfect the regulations concerning organization, systems, discipline, etc., so as to make it impossible for anyone placed within the limits of these laws to do otherwise than obey them. The strength of these organizational relations dominates everyone. It is the same strength that ensures the fullest freedom of action of the people because it represents the common interests of society and the aspiration of each citizen in the new society in which he has his share in the right to be the collective master.
We must work in strict accordance with the regulations and norms of the State. On the other hand, not for a moment should we forget that our State is a proletarian State, a people's State, and that the only master of our society is the people. The State cannot be a patron standing above the people. On the contrary, it is actually the people composed of the working class, the collective farmers and the socialist intellectuals which form their own State functioning under the leadership of the Party with the aim of building a new society. The building of a new society is the cause of the broad masses of the people themselves.
That is why it is our task to carry out permanent education to raise the political and cultural standards of the masses. On the other hand, we must found a system of most appropriate organizational relations and methods of work in order to draw the broad masses of the people into the management of the State and the economy and of all social affairs. Only by means of large-scale, meticulous, persistent and creative organizational work, only
78 79through constant study, thinking out, experimentation, control and repeated changes in the various forms of organization and management of the State organs and the various economic, mass and social organizations in conformity with the requirements of the laws of social existence and development can we found a system of correct and viable relations. And only then can our daily watchwords such as "a co-op is a home, and the co-op members are its owners", or "workers must take part in the management of factories" and, in a broader sense, the right of the masses as the collective masters be translated into a living reality. Otherwise these remain slogans and statements.
To combine the unified activity of the State under the leadership of the Party with the broad initiative and creative actions of the popular masses is the law of development of our regime. We must proceed from this law and this principle in tackling the question of cadres and setting requirements for cadres as well as in tackling the question of organization and setting requirements for the organization.
For a Communist Party in power, for communists managing the State, one of the biggest and most frightful dangers is to stand aloof from the masses and deprive the people of their right as the collective masters. The strength of the Communist Party, of the communists, always lies in their close relations with the masses. In the conditions of a Communist Party already holding power, this must be understood all the more deeply and carried into effect in all organizational measures and methods of activity.
Cadres build up a movement and in return the movement gives birth to cadres. That is a law in the question of cadres. The whole method and organization of our activity, the whole system of our State and economic management must ensure the fullest observance of the right of the working people as the collective masters and on this basis to ensure the capability to mobilize the major sources of strength of the masses, and the whole of their power and potential, in the creation of material and moral values in order to give rise to the broadest, most powerful, best organized and most effective movement for socialist construction. Cadres must mingle with the masses in this movement, march in the van to set an
example for the masses, persuade and organize them, understand their feelings and aspirations, and concern themselves with their everyday moral and material life. They must show modesty and simplicity, listen to the opinions of the masses, gather the masses' experiences and knowledge to complement their own experiences and knowledge. They must constantly place themselves under the control of the masses. In this way, cadres are trained, selected and tempered, and mature along with the movement. And the movement will not cease to give rise to new cadres, able organizers springing from the masses, from the workers, collective farmers and intellectuals---people who, by their self-denying work and their creativity, have made the most notable contributions to the socialist ideal. These are new men of socialism whose most prominent characteristic is their consciousness of being the collective masters and their ability to assume this role, their new attitude toward work, their high sense of organization and discipline. Closely linked with their collectives in the struggle for the common cause, they constantly foster and develop their fine moral qualities and their intellectual powers in accordance with the requirements of a man who is the master of society, master of nature and master of himself.
Deeply imbued with the sense of collectiveness, they understand that their own material well-being and moral happiness and their own future lie in the common welfare and future of all, in the development and in the advance of the whole collective and the whole society. Having identified themselves with the whole society, imbued with the spirit of "each for all and all for each", they know what is good for the collective, society and themselves, and what is bad for the interests of the collective, society and their own interests and, consequently, place all their energies and talents at the service of the collective and society. They resolutely defend the interests of the collective and society, and thereby win the esteem and admiration of all. Such persons have emerged and are emerging more and more in our society. They are first of all the heroes, heroines and model combatants, and individuals with outstanding records in the emulation movement for resistance to U.S. aggression, for national salvation, and in the movement of productive labour to build socialism. Never will the source of
80 81supply of cadres dry up, provided we take care to discover, encourage, foster and promote them.
Let Us Endeavour to Train and Foster Cadres
Generally speaking, cadres are products of a movement. They mature in the organization, in the life and activity of the organization, in the process of work and struggle to bring to reality the political line and tasks. On the other hand, in order to give rise to a movement and to ensure its more and more vigorous development, we must have cadres. To ensure that our organizations can operate, and operate fruitfully, we must have cadres and good ones at that. That is why the foremost task of all revolutionary movements and all revolutionary organizations is to endeavour to train and foster cadres in a systematic manner. At the same time, cadres must endeavour to train themselves and raise their capabilities. This task is now posed before us in all its urgency.
To adequately meet the need for cadres which is very great and covers many spheres, not only at present but also in the long term---a need arising from future stages of development in the economic, cultural, political and social fields, stages which, it can be predicted, will come at a leaping pace and on very broad scale---we must, on the one hand, make the best use of, and endeavour to foster the existing contingent of cadres. On the other hand, we must urgently train batch after batch of cadres through the regular methods such as schools and classes, according to elaborate programmes which correspond to (and go one step ahead of) the plans for long-range development of the economy and culture. The building of socialism and the development of economy and culture are, by their nature, planned work. All activities must be carried out on the basis of, and according to, accurate and scientific norms. That is why the path of training cadres in a regular, large-scale, basic and systematic manner is of decisive importance.
1. Quickly Fostering and Raising the Standard
of Leading and Managing Cadres, and Training New Ones
We must take care to foster and quickly raise the standard of leading and managing cadres and at the same time organize on an
ever-larger scale, training in a basic and systematic way young cadres who are likely later to assume leading and managing responsibilities. It is necessary to arrange and re-organize in a rational way the network of schools to train and foster theoretical and political cadres, cadres for organization and management, for cultural activities and technological services, and to clearly define the objectives and goals of the the training and development in each type of school and class. In particular, we must pay attention to building and perfecting the system of schools to train and foster leading and managing cadres for the various branches of economy, production and commercial units, as well as scientific and technological branches. There must be a plan to select the objects of our training and expand classes for the training of managing cadres coming from the ranks of technical workers who have shown an aptitude for management, from young demobilized army officers and political cadres of the army, from front-rank workers and co-operative farmers, from all those who have been well tested and have recorded outstanding achievements in production and fighting. Besides full-time schools and classes, it is necessary to develop vigorously such forms of study as on-the-job or correspondence courses. Only in these ways can we satisfy the urgent and increasing demands of training.
We must show great concern for the unceasing improvement of training, both in content and quality. With regard to the leading and managing cadres of the various branches and spheres of activity, they must be firmly armed with Marxism-Leninism and the line and policies of the Party, with knowledge in organization and management, with the necessary professional knowledge as well as scientific and technological knowledge. Without a profound knowledge of the Marxist-Leninist theory, and the line and policies of the Party, a cadre cannot grasp the laws governing social and economic development which are the basis of all leading and managerial activities. He will not be able to analyse events as required by the class and scientific viewpoints. Nor will he be able to discover the essence, the linchpin, of the various events and developments, innumerable in their manifestations, of economic and social life.
82,
83Nor will he be able correctly to determine what tasks should be attended to intensively in a given period, nor find the way to carry out economic and political tasks correctly and fruitfully. In a word, without a firm knowledge of Marxist-Leninist science (especially of dialectical materialist methodology, historical materialism, and economics), without a firm grasp of the Party line and policies, we will be left in the dark groping, will easily lose our political bearings and will lack foresight, initiative and creativity in our work.
However, it is quite insufficient for leading and managing cadres merely to have a firm grasp of Marxism-Leninism and the Party line and policies. They must also have great expertise in the areas under their charge, know their work perfectly and also know the up-to-date technological and scientific developments and the latest developments in organizational and managerial work related to their branches of activity. Lenin said: "Anybody who studies real life and has practical experience knows that management necessarily implies competency, that a knowledge of all the conditions of production down to the last detail and of the latest technology of your branch of production is required: you must have had a certain scientific training."(13) This is a necessity not only for managing cadres and leading cadres of each branch but also for leading cadres in general. Obviously, the realities of life, the level of the masses and the necessity to do our work better will no longer permit survival of the old habit of making a few political and ideological remarks and releasing interminable, banal political instructions, allegedly to encourage the masses.
We must absolutely set definite cultural standards for Party executives at all levels. In the leading organs of the Party, including the Party committees, we must in the long run also provide for an appropriate proportion of committee members who are able scientific and technological cadres and experts who also have a firm political stand and rich experience in political struggle. In addition, one thing of prime importance is that Party cadres, and leading cadres at various levels and in various Party organizations, should raise the scientific standard of their leadership by working in close co-operation with scientists and experts and making use of their knowledge and experience. Lenin said: "The Communist who has
I
failed to prove his ability to bring together and guide the work of specialists in a spirit of modesty, going to the heart of the matter and studying it in detail, is a potential menace."(14)
2.Training a Contingent of Scientific and Technological Cadres: a Task of Especial Importance
The task of training a contingent of scientific and technical cadres is of particular importance. Socialism and science and technology are organically linked. We often say that socialist industrialization is the central task of the period of transition. We often speak of the necessity to build the material and technical foundations of socialism. We often stress that the technical revolution is the key to socialist industrialization. But if we do not have---in addition to the fundamental political premises---a numerous and able contigent of scientific and technical cadres we can never attain our objectives. Advancing to socialism without going through the period of capitalist development means that in this respect, too, we are inheriting virtually a complete nought from the past. That is why a very heavy task incumbent on us is to train a large and powerful contingent of scientific and technical cadres sprung from the working class and peasantry, from the ranks of revolutionaries.
This task requires big and ever bigger efforts from the entire national education system, from the general schools to the higher and vocational institutions, from the institutes of social sciences, natural sciences and all branches of science and technology, from all economic and cultural branches, from the trade unions and the Ho Chi Minh Working Youth Union, from the entire people and the whole State machine. We will spare no effort or outlay in this domain, which plays the decisive role with regard to economic progress in our time, and to the process of our advance forward. Our country is endowed with abundant natural riches, and socialism contains immense sources of strength enabling us to tap and make the fullest use of these riches in service of the welfare and happy life of our people. The biggest scientific and technological revolution in the history of mankind is unfolding excitingly in the world. We
84 85must take every opportunity to make use of its gains in order to quickly complete the building of socialism in our country. Technology can be imported but the question is that there must be men to use that technology. That is why we must have a big contingent of scientific and technical cadres completely loyal and dedicated to the socialist cause, eager to move into work on the scientific and technological front, for the sake of the prosperity of the country and the happiness of the people, deeply imbued with the Marxist-Leninist outlook on the world and scientific methodology, with an adequate knowledge of the realities of our country and a firm grasp of the theoretical foundations of the relevant branches of modern science and technology. These cadres must be able to apply this knowledge in an independent and creative manner to the solution of scientific and technical problems posed by the realities of production and life in our country and know how to make the best use of the traditional experience of our people, in order quickly to catch up with advanced world standards.
It is necessary to build an educational system in which all the higher educational institutions and vocational schools, and all branches of the economy and research institutes, share the responsibility for and work in close co-ordination in the training of experts in conformity with the needs of economic development and with the trend of scientific and technological progress. We must proceed urgently to a reform of education in the light of the needs of a quickly developing modern science and technology and make the best preparations for the young generation to carry out productive labour and undertake creative labour in the different domains of science and technology necessary for the national economy.
We must achieve a balanced and homogeneous improvement of the level of the different branches in the whole system of training in the light of the needs of the building and development of the economy and culture, not only in the immediate future but also for a long time to come. The rational utilization of scientific and technical cadres has in itself the effect of training. All branches and levels of leadership and all organizations engaged in scientific and technological activities should review the situation in this sphere and take resolute steps to correct irrationalities without delay. A
i
very fruitful way of training cadres on-the-job is to assign them appropriate work, give them all the help needed, and create conditions for them to accomplish their work, supply them with adequate study materials and widely develop all forms of partwork-part-study. It is necessary on the one hand to combine correctly the unified management of science and technology, and organize the various forms of collective work and socialist co-- operation that will make it possible to concentrate the efforts of scientific and technical cadres on resolving definite tasks and, on the other hand, to care for, discover, encourage, support and develop to the maximum all creative power of the collectives of scientific and technical workers and of each scientific and technical cadre. This has an important significance for the continuous raising of the standards and capabilities of scientific and technical cadres.
3. Cadres Must Constantly Train and Temper Themselves
Training and tempering oneself is for any leading and managing cadre or scientific and technical cadre an indispensable condition for the consistent raising of his qualities and standards.
Cadres in general, and, in the first place, Party members and cadres, are the most advanced representatives of the masses with regard to political and ideological stand, scientific knowledge, understanding of social obligations, and the capacity to find ways and means to resolve these tasks, as well as with regard to the, sense of being the collective master, the spirit of putting public interest above personal interests and a sound, modest, and healthy way of life. Each cadre, first of all, each Communist, must be an example to the masses with regard to the unfailing loyalty to MarxismLeninism, to the socialist and communist ideal. He must show the highest sense of organization and discipline, a great deal of revolutionary enthusiasm and ardour for work, clearsightedness in action and the firmest will in daily endeavours for the success of the revolutionary cause. We cannot conceive of a cadre who falls short of mass levels in revolutionary consciousness, in level of knowledge and in capacity to resolve questions posed by the revolutionary tasks, in revolutionary ardour and zeal in work. There is no
86 87doubt that today the level of the masses is definitely higher than in the past and has the most favourable conditions to grow and mature quickly in all fields.
All of this requires from each cadre sustained and major efforts, a strict sense of responsibility in learning and training in order to raise himself constantly to the level of his tasks. His responsibility consists first of all in learning and he must understand this word in its fullest and deepest sense. It is necessary to read books and newspapers, to acquire therefrom the knowledge accumulated by mankind. Lenin said: "One can become a Communist only after having enriched one's mind through the acquisition of all the treasures of knowledge created by mankind . . . only on the basis of modern knowledge can that society (Communist society---L.D.) be created . . . and without this knowledge, Communism remains but an aspiration."(15) It must be said that quite a few of our cadres are still lazy, very lazy in the matter of reading books, and some do not even read Party newspapers. That is absolutely unpardonable for a Party member and cadre. Of course, reading books is not synonymous with being a bookworm. However, we cannot use opposition to being a bookworm as an excuse for laziness in learning. The point is to know how to read books in order not to become a bookworm but to acquire knowledge, to enrich our minds with science in all practical matters.
We must learn not only through books and newspapers, but also in practical life, in our own work, in the summing up of the experiences of our work, through frequent self-criticism and criticism. The ultimate goal of learning through books is to solve questions arising from life and work. Summing up experiences and selfcriticism and criticism are methods of study of paramount importance. A cadre must create for himself the habit of thinking independently and the capacity to analyse, in the process of endeavouring to carry out his tasks, the class significance, the socio-economic effect of each measure being applied. He must proceed from his own experience to review each step he has taken and hence to draw accurate and scientific conclusions that will help him to illuminate the path ahead, give the fullest scope to what is right and severely and sincerely to make self-criticism of the wrong
without fearing to mend his errors and persist in his efforts. Never should he be complacent. It is difficult for any cadre who lacks such qualities and qualifications to mature and to be equal to his tasks.
We must combine learning through books with learning from the practice of life, work, the experiences of the collective, the experiences of one's organization and of kindred organizations, the experiences of the leaders and of the masses, the experiences of our country and of others, the lessons of success and also the lessons of failure. Theory constantly linked with practice and practice enlightened by theory, our minds active at all times, and our thinking always linked with action, this is our method of learning. This is the main method for improving our theoretical thinking and our capacities for practice. In both these areas our deficiency is still evident, limiting our creative powers and preventing us from achieving the highest results in our work.
The leading and managerial tasks of the Party and State are very heavy and will become more and more so. With our full sense of responsibility to the people, we never hide our weaknesses, shortcomings and even the errors sometimes committed in our work. The fact is that "the art of administration does not descend from heaven, it is not inspired by the Holy Ghost. And the fact that a class is a leading class does not make it at once capable of administering .... We, therefore, say that the victorious class must be mature."(16) It is precisely for that reason that we have realized all the importance of the task of learning. "Learn, learn more, learn forever." Every cadre, whatever his position, whether he is an old hand or a newcomer, must study hard. The higher his position and the heavier his responsibility, the harder he must study because some defect or error resulting from his incapacity could lead to great damage. Veteran cadres must study still harder in order to meet new requirements. New and younger cadres naturally must show the greatest zeal and perseverance in learning. They must show genuine modesty and should never be complacent or consider themselves as knowing more than others. They must show determination to scale the highest peaks in all domains of knowledge necessary for our cause of creating a new society.
Learning has always been for all Party members and cadres, a
88 89criterion of Party character. For cadres in general and for every citizen without exception, learning is a duty already laid down by the National Assembly. It is necessary to bring about a stirring, widespread and permanent movement for learning. The goal of learning should not be limited to raising our level of knowledge. Rather it is to achieve the best results in our productive labour, our work and our struggle. We must try by all means to bring about a stirring movement to attain high peaks in culture and knowledge in our productive labour, our work and our struggle, with the determination to make culture and knowledge our weapon and our strength in the struggle to become masters of society, masters of culture and masters of ourselves. This is an important manifestation of the fighting stand of the class engaged in building a system of collective mastery and creating a really civilized society.
We should never forget that learning and the whole system of education must combine the need of raising our consciousness and knowledge with that of raising our communist qualities and morality, and that "Communist morality is based on the struggle for the consolidation and completion of communism. That is also the basis of communist training, education and teaching."(17) We are learning for the sake of this great cause. We must learn in such a way that all the knowledge we accumulate will help in the formation, strengthening and constant raising of our proletarian ideology, our Marxist-Leninist outlook on the world and our Communist outlook on life, in such a way that the communist ideal and the scientific knowledge of communism really become the personal beliefs of everyone, the motive force and the compass for all our daily activities.
In the conditions of a Party holding State power, and of the implementation of the socialist law of distribution according to work done, it is natural that in the life of cadres there arises the question of position and remuneration which should be solved by the Party and State policies in a rational way, and in keeping with the principle of giving incentives to labour and talent and with each step forward of socialism. However, a Communist would deny himself that noble name if he let such questions prevail over and even replace his noble ideal and qualities, the ideal for which we
I
have of our own free will placed ourselves under the Party banner and have sworn to fight all our life in defiance of all hardships and sacrifices, the ideal for which we have so many times risked our lives and for which our people have consistently and loyally followed the Party, trusted and loved us, the ideal for the realization of which our people have shed and are shedding so much sweat and blood even though its complete realization is still a long way off and many privations and hardships are ahead. We must link learning with struggle, struggle against ourselves and struggle for the realization of our revolutionary tasks, so that the noble socialist and communist ideal completely prevails in our minds, in our lives and in all our daily activities, and also in the life of the entire society, so that individualism has no more room in our minds and actions or in social life as a whole.
The sense of organization and discipline is absolutely necessary in revolutionary struggle. That is why one of the foremost qualities which a cadre must constantly foster is the sense of organization and discipline. This is the most important virtue manifesting the ideology of the proletariat of being the collective masters, which is basically opposed to individualism and bourgeois and petty-- bourgeois liberalism.
Not only in theory but also through the whole experience of proletarian dictatorship in the world, the following famous proposition of Lenin has proved its extraordinary vitality: "The essence of proletarian dictatorship is not in force alone, or even mainly in force. Its chief feature is the organization and discipline of the advanced contingent of the working people, of their vanguard, of their sole leader, the proletariat."(18) The enemy can knock down the revolutionaries when their ranks are confused, when they are "like an orchestra in which the drum and the trumpet do not play in tune." But if they are a monolithic army in which millions keep the same pace and act as one man, the revolution is invincible, proletarian dictatorship is invincible.
Even the slightest slackening of discipline suffices to create a fissure for the enemy to thrust his hands into. On the contrary, if we can maintain the sense of organization and discipline and the
90 91unity of mind of the proletariat and the vanguard leading brigade of proletarian dictatorship we can already to some extent cool the counter-revolutionary hysteria of the class enemy in their criminal plots. And, when proletarian dictatorship needs violence for repression, it is also this sense of organization and discipline that constitutes the basis, the main source of strength, to ensure the triumph of revolutionary violence over counter-revolutionary violence
We need organization and discipline not only to defend proletarian dictatorship against all plots and acts of revival and subversion of the counter-revolutionary forces inside and outside the country, but also to ensure that proletarian dictatorship really becomes a power of the people. The people give us ample powers to work in their interests. But, if after having been vested with powers, we do not bind ourselves by very stringent rules in organization, discipline and also in law, if we do not severely place ourselves within these ties, then we are very apt to do wrong things harmful to the interests of the people.
The absolute necessity for us to be an organized and disciplined body stems from the very nature and objective of the struggle of proletarian dictatorship aimed at reforming the old society and building a new one. This is the prime condition for the building of the socialist economy. Socialism is the abolition of the capitalist regime and the system of private ownership in general, the source of inorganization in production leading to sharp contradictions and conflicts in the whole of social life. This regime and system are being replaced by the collective, socialist, system of ownership of the means of production which makes possible and requires organized, centralized and unified production on a nation-wide scale by millions of persons according to a calculated plan and by means of large-scale mechanized industry.
However, the greatest difficulty for socialism, for the building of socialism, actually lies in the organizational field, in the task of establishing a new labour discipline and a new social discipline. This difficulty is all the greater and all the more intractable if we are advancing from small-scale production. In this case, proletarian dictatorship must go through a period of protracted and arduous struggle between the organizational and disciplinary character of
1the proletariat on the one hand and the very dangerous power of spontaneous development of the state of inorganization and anarchy of the petty-bourgeoisie on the other. This state of things pervades all domains of social life: in economy, in style of work, in ideology and in the general attitude of people, in their customs and habits ....
We have steered small-scale production onto the path of collectivization. The system of small private ownership has been replaced by collective ownership which forms, together with the system of all-people ownership, the unified socialist economic structure. That is a success of historic significance. That is a very fundamental victory of the organizational and disciplinary character of the proletariat over the liberal, scattered, inorganized and anarchist character of the petty-bourgeoisie. However, this is only an initial step and barely an initial step. The organizational path is a long path to create new forms of social discipline. It takes decades. In fact, only large-scale mechanized industry can truly create and ensure an organizational and disciplinary character in a really full and lasting way. However, big mechanized industry is precisely what we are striving to create in order to equip all sections of the national economy and to provide the foundation for socialist production relations.
We have always believed that only when this objective is reached can the socialist transformation of small production be considered really completed.
It is because our economy still bears the marked characteristics of small production in all respects: technology, organization of production and methods of production, that there is still ground for the state of dispersion, liberalism, spontaneous development, inorganization and anarchy, to flourish. The struggle against this state of things, which runs completely counter to socialism, must be carried on with the greatest firmness and perseverance. Otherwise, socialism cannot triumph.
The political and ideological education and the organization and control work undertaken by the Party and the various mass organizations, especially the trade unions and the Youth Union, as well as the legal work of the state, must be closely combined in
92 93order to consolidate and strengthen the organizational and disciplinary character of our society, especially within the Party organizations, within the ranks of cadres, in the State organs and managerial organs. Our proletarian dictatorship, first of all the vanguard leading contingent of the dictatorship, i.e. our Party itself, must prove its strength by its organizational and disciplinary character. This is one of the fundamental conditions to ensure success for the great cause of socialist construction.
A new period of the revolution in our country has begun.
The great victory of our sacred resistance to U.S. aggression, for national salvation has created unprecedentedly favourable conditions for the building of socialism in the North as well as for the completion of the national people's democratic revolution in the South. This is the most glorious period in our national history. Many new possibilities have emerged and are emerging, making it possible for us to take still greater strides forward on the road toward building a unified Viet Nam in independence, freedom, peace and prosperity.
The victories recorded by our people are extremely great. Extremely bright prospects are open to us. However we should by no means rest on our laurels and forget that the road to our ultimate goal remains very long, very complex and full of hardships. Our Party and people are facing new battles that require concentrated and major efforts to give a powerful stimulus to the building of a new economy, a new regime and a new man so that the socialist North can develop to the highest degree its historic influence on the revolutionary cause of the whole country in the new stage. The victories of historic significance recorded in the past period of struggle prove that our people, our nation, under the leadership of our Party, armed with an independent, sovereign, correct and creative line, are fully capable of solving the questions posed by the present era in the life of our nation. This is a firm basis for our confidence in final victory in the process of our struggle for the radiant future of our country and for the high peaks of human civilization.
``To build socialism, it is necessary to have socialist men." That
teaching of President Ho Chi Minh, now more than ever, must be understood in its fullest meaning and strictly observed, first of all among Party cadres and members. In the new struggle, in our capacity as the collective masters, we must give full play to the revolutionary heroism and intelligence which has been so magnificently displayed in the anti-U.S. war of resistance, for national salvation. Let every one of us devote all his energies and talents to the revolution in the new period in order to bring prosperity to our country and happiness to our people!
Let all our Party cadres and members strive still harder, make still greater and continuous efforts in order to be worthy of their duties, worthy of our glorious Party and our glorious nation.
95 94Le Duan on the Vietnamese Revolution
The New Stage
of our Revolution
and the Tasks
of the Trade Unions
Our revolution has entered a new stage in very favourable conditions but the battle for complete independence and freedom throughout the country remains very difficult and complex. This calls for a vigorous all-round growth of the North, and consequently for the latter's quicker and stronger advance toward socialism. That is the natural requirement born of the law of internal development of the socialist revolution itself in North Viet Nam. The Party's Central Committee's 22nd Plenum defined the North's general tasks in the new stage as follows: unite the whole people, fight for the safeguarding of peace, actively carry out socialist industrialization, vigorously impel the three revolutions, (1) build the North and take it speedily, vigorously and steadily to socialism; closely coordinate economy and national defence, heighten vigilance, stand ready to foil every scheme of the U.S. and its agents; do our best to discharge our duty in the revolutionary struggle for the completion of independence and democracy in South Viet Nam and for ultimate national reunification, fulfil our internationalist obligation toward the Lao and Khmer revolutions.
The North's task in the two years 1974 and 1975 is: to rapidly complete the healing of the wounds of war, actively rehabilitate
Speech at the third Viet Nam Trade Union Congress (February 11-14, 1974).
99